Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34236075›Full record

ReviewBioscience reports2021

Recent advancements in the exploitation of the gut microbiome in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Katie J Stott, Bethan Phillips, Lee Parry, Stephanie May

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Association ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katie J Stott *European Cancer Stem Cell Research Institute, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, U.K.
Bethan Phillips *European Cancer Stem Cell Research Institute, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, U.K.
Lee ParryEuropean Cancer Stem Cell Research Institute, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-4467-9196
Stephanie MayCRUK Beatson Institute, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, U.K.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27517Cancer Research UK A17196Cancer Research UK C23498/A27517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few decades it has been established that the complex interaction between the host and the multitude of organisms that compose the intestinal microbiota plays an important role in human metabolic health and disease. Whilst there is no defined consensus on the composition of a healthy microbiome due to confounding factors such as ethnicity, geographical locations, age and sex, there are undoubtably populations of microbes that are consistently dysregulated in gut diseases including colorectal cancer (CRC). In this review, we discuss the most recent advances in the application of the gut microbiota, not just bacteria, and derived microbial compounds in the diagnosis of CRC and the potential to exploit microbes as novel agents in the management and treatment of CRC. We highlight examples of the microbiota, and their derivatives, that have the potential to become standalone diagnostic tools or be used in combination with current screening techniques to improve sensitivity and specificity for earlier CRC diagnoses and provide a perspective on their potential as biotherapeutics with translatability to clinical trials.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBacteriaColorectal NeoplasmsDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansProbioticsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic Agentsbacterio-thearpycolorectal cancerdiagnostic biomarkersintestinemicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID34236075
PMCPMC8314433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.