Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34235649›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Extraction and Separation of Mycobacterial Proteins.

Megan Lucas, Joan M Ryan, Jackson Watkins, Kala Early, Nicole A Kruh-Garcia, Carolina Mehaffy, Karen M Dobos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Establishment of minimum protein standards forMycobacteria (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Antigen specificity shapes antibody functions in tuberculosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan LucasMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Joan M RyanMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Jackson WatkinsMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Kala EarlyMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Nicole A Kruh-GarciaMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Carolina MehaffyMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Karen M DobosMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Karen.dobos@colostate.edu.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000027CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201600013C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction and separation of native mycobacterial proteins remain necessary for antigen discovery, elucidation of enzymes to improve rational drug design, identification of physiologic mechanisms, use as reagents for diagnostics, and defining host immune responses. In this chapter, methods for the manipulation of whole mycobacterial cells and culture exudates are described in detail as these methods are the requisite first steps towards native protein isolation. Specifically, several methods for the inactivation of viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis along with qualification assays are provided, as this is key to safe manipulation of cell pastes for downstream processes. Next, the concentration of spent culture filtrate media in order to permit separation of soluble, secreted proteins is described followed by the separation of mycobacteria extracellular vesicles (MEV) from the remaining soluble proteins in spent media. We then describe the generation of whole-cell lysate and facile separation of lysate into subcellular fractions to afford cell wall, cell membrane, and cytosol-enriched proteins. Due to the hydrophobic nature of cell wall and cell membrane proteins, several extraction protocols to resolve protein subsets (such as extraction with urea and SDS) are also provided. Finally, methods for separation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic proteins from both whole-cell lysate and spent culture media are included. While these methods were optimized for the manipulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cells, they have been successfully applied to extract and isolate Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium ulcerans, and Mycobacterium avium proteins.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCell MembraneMembrane ProteinsMycobacterium tuberculosisSubcellular FractionsBacterial ProteinsMembrane ProteinsAmmonium sulfateBead beatingCulture filtrateExtracellular vesiclesFrench pressGamma irradiationGuanidine HCLProbe sonicationSDSSubcellular fractionationTriton X-114Urea

Identifiers

PMID34235649
OpenAlexW3182936773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.