Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34235608›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Improving the delivery of team-based survivorship care after primary breast cancer treatment through a multi-level intervention: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Lauren P Wallner, Paul Abrahamse, Joan G Gargaro, Archana Radhakrishnan, Megan A Mullins, Lawrence C An, Jennifer J Griggs, Anne F Schott, John Z Ayanian, Anne E Sales and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effectiveness of personalised surveillance and aftercare in breast cancer follow-up: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Exploring the barriers to optimal survivorship care for people living with Cancer in NSW.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Social Determinants of Health in Imaging-based Cancer Screening: A Case-based Primer with Strategies for Care Improvement.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Oncology and Primary Care Provider Views on Cancer Survivorship Care: Mind the Gap.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lauren P WallnerDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 409E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA. lwallner@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1279-8617
Paul AbrahamseRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Joan G GargaroAnn Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Archana RadhakrishnanDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 409E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.
Megan A MullinsRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lawrence C AnDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 409E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.
Jennifer J GriggsRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anne F SchottRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John Z AyanianDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 409E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.
Anne E SalesInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Steven KatzDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 409E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.
Sarah T HawleyDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 409E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Interdisciplinary Research Training Center in Cancer Care DeliveryT32CA236621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lauren P Wallner · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
Patient-centered, team-based continuing care after breast cancer treatmentK07CA201052 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WALLNER, LAUREN P · 2016 to 2019
$601k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA201052NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P30 CA46592NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe developed and tested a multi-level intervention, ConnectedCancerCare (CCC), which includes a tailored website and appointment reminder system for women with early-stage breast cancer and a provider summary letter sent to their medical oncologist and primary care provider to improve the delivery of team-based survivorship care.

methodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to establish the feasibility and acceptability of CCC. Women diagnosed with stages 0-II breast cancer within one year of completing primary treatment were randomized to CCC (intervention) or a static online survivorship care plan (control). Participants completed baseline and 3-month follow-up surveys online. Post-trial interviews with 5 PCPs, 6 oncology providers, and 8 intervention patients were conducted.

resultsOf the 160 eligible women invited to participate, 66 completed the baseline survey and were randomized (41%) and 54 completed a follow-up survey (83%). Participants in the intervention arm found the CCC content to be acceptable, with 82% reporting it was easy to use and 86% reporting they would recommend it to other patients. Women randomized to CCC (vs. control) more often reported scheduling a PCP follow-up visit (64% vs. 42%), communicating with their PCP about provider roles (67% vs. 18%), and higher mean team-based cancer care knowledge scores (3.7 vs. 3.4).

conclusionDeploying CCC in medical oncology practices was feasible, and the intervention content was acceptable. CCC shows promise for improving patient knowledge and patient-provider communication about provider roles in team-based cancer care and encouraging patients to engage with their PCP early in the survivorship period.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSurvivorshipContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansMedical OncologyPilot ProjectsCancer survivorshipCare coordinationPrimary careTeam-based cancer care

Identifiers

PMID34235608
PMCPMC8375358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.