Trial reportCardiovascular and interventional radiology2021
24-Month Efficacy and Safety Results from Japanese Patients in the IMPERIAL Randomized Study of the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Stent and the Zilver PTX Drug-Coated Stent.
Trial report in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02574481 (A Randomized Trial Comparing the ELUVIA™ Drug-eluting Stent Versus Zilver® PTX® Stent for Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Arteries), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial Comparing the ELUVIA™ Drug-eluting Stent Versus Zilver® PTX® Stent for Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Arteries
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Factors Associated with 2-year Mortality in Patients with Intermittent Claudication Treated with Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Lesions: Results from the Multicenter PROCYON Study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- Catch Up with the Latest Trend in Vascular Intervention-Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia Up to Date.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2025Review
- Introducing and utilizing innovative technologies in health care systems: a country comparison for peripheral drug-eluting stents in Germany and the USA.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Different drugs in drug-eluting stents for peripheral artery disease: a systematic evaluation and Bayesian meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2024Review
- Retrospective multicenter registry for endovascular treatment with newer devices in over 25-cm femoropopliteal artery disease: A retrospective observational study.Health science reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study is to report 24-month efficacy and safety results for the Japanese patient cohort in a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) of drug-eluting stent (DES) use for peripheral artery disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients in the global IMPERIAL RCT had femoropopliteal lesions treated with either the Eluvia DES (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) or the Zilver PTX drug-coated stent (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). At 24 months, assessments included duplex ultrasound imaging for core laboratory vessel patency measurement, target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates, and clinical outcome measures.
resultsThe Japanese cohort included 84 patients (56 treated with Eluvia and 28 with Zilver PTX). The clinically driven TLR rates were 5.6% (3/54) and 18.5% (5/27) for patients treated with Eluvia and Zilver PTX, respectively (difference -13.0%, 95%CI -28.8, 2.9%; p = 0.11). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from clinically driven TLR at 24 months were 94.3% for patients who received Eluvia and 80.4% for those who received Zilver PTX (log rank p = 0.05), and for primary patency they were 88.5% and 80.4%, respectively (log rank p = 0.28). Mortality rates were 5.6% (3/54) and 11.1% (3/27); p = 0.39. Rutherford classification improved by at least one category without TLR for 91.8% (45/49) and 68.2% (15/22) of patients (p = 0.03). Walking impairment score improvements were sustained over time.
conclusionThe results at 24 months support the efficacy and safety of DES in Japanese patients, with sustained clinical improvements and numerically fewer reinterventions for those treated with Eluvia. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02574481. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02574481 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: EBM Level III; cohort analysis of randomized trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.