ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021
CT findings and outcomes of acute cholecystitis: is additional ultrasound necessary?
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a diagnostic model for acute suppurative cholecystitis in older patients: LASSO-Logistic regression analysis using readily available clinical indicators.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning enables accurate diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and prediction of suppuration using noncontrast CT.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile ultrasound is often the preferred imaging modality for suspected acute cholecystitis (AC), CT is often the first line study when patients are being evaluated for abdominal pain. The diagnostic value of CT in the setting of AC is controversial, given the prevalent use of additional imaging. PURPOSE: To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of CT for diagnosing acute cholecystitis (AC) when used as a first line imaging study for evaluating abdominal pain and assess if additional imaging with ultrasound studies provides additional clinically useful information. MATERIALS AND
methodsAbnormal gallbladder findings in CT imaging studies were queried in a retrospective study over a 25-month period within a large urban health system. Sonographic (US) studies performed within 72 h of the initial CT were also included. Outcomes were determined by surgical pathology, fluid analysis, and clinical outcomes. Cases were stratified by the interpreting radiologist's subjective confidence level of diagnosing AC, and the PPVs were compared between cases using CT without US and cases with both CT and US.
resultsOf the 468 CT studies meeting criteria, 192 were read as concerning for AC. PPV of CT was 44.7% without US and 50.5% when US was positive, which amounted to an insignificant gain (p = 0.41). When subdividing by confidence level, high-confidence positive CTs demonstrated no significant difference without ultrasound (80%) compared to with ultrasound (75%). Less confident reads in CT demonstrated potential gain from ultrasound; in the case of a "probable" CT impression, PPV increased from 45% without US to 90% with a high-confidence ultrasound impression.
conclusionBased on current practice within a large health system, CT examinations with high suspicion for AC demonstrated little gain from follow-up ultrasound. However, ultrasound may be of benefit when CT interpretations are less confident but still suspicious for AC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34235552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.