ReviewRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2021
Noninvasive Morphologic and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.
Review in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative evaluation of computational fluid dynamics application development in the cardiovascular field through literature retrieval and bibliometric analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Article
- Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental andProgress in materials science · 2025Article
- Predicting Late Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection: Results From the ROADMAP Validation Study.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Patient-specific modelling of pulmonary arterial hypertension: wall shear stress correlates with disease severity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Masquerading as Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Case Report.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Computational fluid dynamics modelling of hemodynamics in aortic aneurysm and dissection: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Clinical Imaging and Innovations in Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024Review
- Investigating the role of thrombosis and false lumen orbital orientation in the hemodynamics of Type B aortic dissection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis for a Dimensionally Reduced-Order Model of the Aortic Dissection.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- Interval changes in four-dimensional flow-derived in vivo hemodynamics stratify aortic growth in type B aortic dissection patients.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Article
- Aortic Hemodynamics with Accelerated Dual-Venc 4D Flow MRI in Type B Aortic Dissection.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Entry tear hemodynamics using 4D flow MRI in a patient with acute type B aortic dissection.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- "Uncomplicated" Type B Aortic Dissection: It's Complicated.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2022Article
- Registry of Aortic Diseases to Model Adverse Events and Progression (ROADMAP) in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Study Design and Rationale.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2022Article
- Clinical Application of 4D Flow MR Imaging for the Abdominal Aorta.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022Article
- Baseline 4D Flow-DerivedFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Entry Tear Dominance at CT Angiography Predicts Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Aortic Dissection: Another Piece of the Puzzle.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2021Article
- Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Blood Flow on Tears in Type B Aortic Dissection With Different Morphologies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with relatively high rates of morbidity and mortality, and appropriate treatment selection is important for optimizing patient outcomes. Depending on individualized risk factors, clinical presentation, and imaging findings, patients are generally stratified to optimal medical therapy anchored by antihypertensives or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Using standard anatomic imaging with CT or MRI, several high-risk features including aortic diameter, false lumen (FL) features, size of entry tears, involvement of major aortic branch vessels, or evidence of visceral malperfusion have been used to select patients likely to benefit from TEVAR. However, even with these measures, the number needed to treat for TEVAR remains, and improved risk stratification is needed. Increasingly, the relationship between FL hemodynamics and adverse aortic remodeling in TBAD has been studied, and evolving noninvasive techniques can measure numerous FL hemodynamic parameters that may improve risk stratification. In addition to summarizing the current clinical state of the art for morphologic TBAD evaluation, this review provides a detailed overview of noninvasive methods for TBAD hemodynamics characterization, including computational fluid dynamics and four-dimensional flow MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.