Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34235352›Full record

ArticlePediatric quality & safety

Better Etiquette for Effective Paging (B.E.E.P.)-Improving Daily In-hospital Communications in the Pediatric ICU.

Harsha K Chandnani, Shana Fujimoto, Michele Wilson, Julie Fluitt, Janae Jones, Salem Dehom, Cynthia Tinsley, Merrick Lopez

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harsha K ChandnaniDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif.
Shana FujimotoDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif.
Michele WilsonDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif.
Julie FluittDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif.
Janae JonesDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif.
Salem DehomLoma Linda University School of Nursing, Loma Linda, Calif.
Cynthia TinsleyDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif.
Merrick LopezDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif.
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital · USLoma Linda University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPaging is a vital part of patient care that allows quick contact between physicians and other hospital personnel. There was no structured way to send a page to physicians at our institution. We hypothesized that by standardizing paging format, scheduling laboratory draw times, and using order clean-up sheets, through a bundle of interventions called Better Etiquette for Effective Paging, we would decrease the number of pages received on the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) resident pager by 15%.

methodsThis project was a quality improvement initiative in a 25-bed multidisciplinary PICU in a tertiary children's hospital. Baseline data collection was performed in December 2015, categorized by time of day received and type of page. Interventions were paging standards to include relevant information, scheduling laboratory draw times, and order clean-up sheets. We collected postintervention data over 3 years to monitor for sustained change.

resultsThe average number of pages decreased from a baseline of 4.71 pages/patient/d in 2015 to 3.70 in 2016 (21% decrease), 3.32 in 2017 (30% decrease), and 2.74 in 2018 (42% decrease). The average PRISM 3 score remained similar in all sets (2.52, 2.50, 2.10, and 2.35). The standardized mortality ratio was not adversely affected by the decrease in pages (0.58, 1.07, 1.19, and 0).

conclusionStandardizing the format of pages and using scheduled laboratory times with order clean-up sheets has decreased the number of pages/patient/d in the PICU by 42% without adversely affecting patient care. We can continue to improve communication among the patient care team by emphasizing efficient, standardized communication using Better Etiquette for Effective Paging.

Identifiers

PMID34235352
PMCPMC8225373
OpenAlexW3175749062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.