ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Better Etiquette for Effective Paging (B.E.E.P.)-Improving Daily In-hospital Communications in the Pediatric ICU.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and implementation of paging and escalation guidelines to improve interprofessional communication on surgical units.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Use of pager devices in New Zealand public hospitals as a critical communication tool: Barriers & way forward.Heliyon · 2023Review
- To the Editor: Actions More Powerful Than Words-An Impactful Approach to Overcoming Page Burden.Journal of graduate medical education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPaging is a vital part of patient care that allows quick contact between physicians and other hospital personnel. There was no structured way to send a page to physicians at our institution. We hypothesized that by standardizing paging format, scheduling laboratory draw times, and using order clean-up sheets, through a bundle of interventions called Better Etiquette for Effective Paging, we would decrease the number of pages received on the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) resident pager by 15%.
methodsThis project was a quality improvement initiative in a 25-bed multidisciplinary PICU in a tertiary children's hospital. Baseline data collection was performed in December 2015, categorized by time of day received and type of page. Interventions were paging standards to include relevant information, scheduling laboratory draw times, and order clean-up sheets. We collected postintervention data over 3 years to monitor for sustained change.
resultsThe average number of pages decreased from a baseline of 4.71 pages/patient/d in 2015 to 3.70 in 2016 (21% decrease), 3.32 in 2017 (30% decrease), and 2.74 in 2018 (42% decrease). The average PRISM 3 score remained similar in all sets (2.52, 2.50, 2.10, and 2.35). The standardized mortality ratio was not adversely affected by the decrease in pages (0.58, 1.07, 1.19, and 0).
conclusionStandardizing the format of pages and using scheduled laboratory times with order clean-up sheets has decreased the number of pages/patient/d in the PICU by 42% without adversely affecting patient care. We can continue to improve communication among the patient care team by emphasizing efficient, standardized communication using Better Etiquette for Effective Paging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.