Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34235345›Full record

ArticlePain reports

A rat model to investigate quality of recovery after abdominal surgery.

Juan P Cata, Miguel Patiño, Michael J Lacagnina, Jiahe Li, Aysegul Gorur, Ruben Agudelo-Jimenez, Bo Wei, Carin A Hagberg, Patrick M Dougherty, Imad Shureiqi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Juan P CataDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-1682
Miguel PatiñoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Michael J LacagninaLaboratories of Neuroimmunology, Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2468-2467
Jiahe LiLaboratories of Neuroimmunology, Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Aysegul GorurDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ruben Agudelo-JimenezDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7542-5797
Bo WeiDepartments of Integrative Medicine Research.
Carin A HagbergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Patrick M DoughertyPain Medicine and.ORCID 0000-0002-2177-2734
Imad ShureiqiGastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2019-938X
Peiying YangDepartments of Integrative Medicine Research.
Peter M GraceLaboratories of Neuroimmunology, Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8999-1220
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USIntegrative Medicine Institute · USPain and Rehabilitation Medicine · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMajor advances in therapies to optimize recovery after surgery have been limited by the lack of an animal model that can mimic major domains of postoperative sickness behavior in humans. We hypothesized that the integration of commonly impaired domains of quality of recovery in humans could be reproduced in a rat model.

objectivesTo create a rat model that can mimic surgical recovery in humans.

methodsAdult male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in the development of a quality of recovery score after surgery. Six physiological parameters or behaviors were tested in naive, sham, and laparotomized animals. A quality of recovery score was constructed and ranged from 18 (no impairment) to 0 (gross impairment). We treated animals with a nutraceutical intervention consisting of aspirin and eicosapentaenoic acid. Inflammatory markers and specialized proresolving mediators were measured in serum and the intestinal mucosa of rats, respectively.

resultsWe observed a significant reduction in quality of recovery scores on postoperative days 1 (median, interquartile: 6 [4.75-8.25] vs naive rats: 17.5 [15.5-18]), 2 (median, interquartile: 13 [11.25-13.25],

conclusionOur novel rat model can be used to study mechanisms governing surgical recovery in rats.

Indexed as

AspirinEicosapentaenoic acidLaparotomyRecoverySurgery

Identifiers

PMID34235345
PMCPMC8253582
OpenAlexW3178503617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.