ArticleACS omega2021
Proteomics Study on the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Encephalitis.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibition of FAM19A5 reverses synaptic loss and cognitive decline in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Trial
- Metabolic Signatures and Diagnostic Strategies for Different Types of Encephalitis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- The Gut-Brain-Immune Axis: Multi-Omics Insights into Neurodegenerative and Metabolic Diseases.Cells · 2026Review
- Quality Control-A Stepchild in Quantitative Proteomics: A Case Study for the Human CSF Proteome.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Quantitative proteomics on the cerebrospinal fluid of hydrocephalus in neonatal bacterial meningitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLabel-free quantitative proteomics was applied to analyze differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with encephalitis. The database was used to screen for possible biomarkers in encephalitis, followed by validation and preliminary investigation of the role of some DEPs in the pathogenesis of encephalitis using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
methodsWe performed label-free quantitative proteomics on 16 cerebrospinal fluid samples (EM group, encephalitis with mental and behavioral disorders patients,
resultsA total of 941 proteins were found to be significantly differentially expressed, including 250 upregulated DEPs and 691 downregulated DEPs. GO analysis suggested that there were six enriched functions that intersect among the EM, NED, and N groups, including synapse organization, membrane, integral component of membrane, membrane part, G-protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, and transmembrane signaling receptor activity. KEGG analysis revealed that there were three signaling pathways that intersect among the EM, NED, and N groups, including fructose and mannose metabolism, inositol phosphate metabolism, and Jak-STAT signaling pathway. Furthermore, four downregulated encephalitis-related neurological synapse proteins were identified after screening for differentially expressed proteins, including NRXN3, NFASC, LRRC4B, and NLGN2. The result of ELISA further verified that the expression of NLGN2 and LRRC4B was obviously higher in the NED group than in the N group.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrated that NLGN2 and LRRC4B proteins were upregulated in the NED group and could be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of encephalitis, but still needs a lot of multiomics studies to be used in clinical.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.