Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34235105›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2021

A Semi-Automatic Step-by-Step Expert-Guided LI-RADS Grading System Based on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.

Ruofan Sheng, Jing Huang, Weiguo Zhang, Kaipu Jin, Li Yang, Huanhuan Chong, Jia Fan, Jian Zhou, Dijia Wu, Mengsu Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruofan Sheng *Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-9450
Jing Huang *Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Weiguo ZhangDushuhu District, No. 1 Affiliated Hospital, Suzhou University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Kaipu JinDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Li YangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Huanhuan ChongDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jia FanDepartment of Liver Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Liver Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Dijia WuShanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Mengsu ZengDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0030-9254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) classification, especially the identification of LR-3 to 5 lesions with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) probability, is of great significance to treatment strategy determination. We aimed to develop a semi-automatic LI-RADS grading system on multiphase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using deep convolutional neural networks (CNN). PATIENTS AND

methodsAn internal data set of 439 patients and external data set of 71 patients with suspected HCC were included and underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. The expert-guided LI-RADS grading system consisted of four deep 3D CNN models including a tumor segmentation model for automatic diameter estimation and three classification models of LI-RADS major features including arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE), washout and enhancing capsule. An end-to-end learning system comprising single deep CNN model that directly classified the LI-RADS grade was developed for comparison.

resultsOn internal testing set, the segmentation model reached a mean dice of 0.84, with the accuracy of mapped diameter intervals as 82.7% (95% CI: 74.4%, 91.7%). The area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.941 (95% CI: 0.914, 0.961), 0.859 (95% CI: 0.823, 0.890) and 0.712 (95% CI: 0.668, 0.754) for APHE, washout and capsule, respectively. The expert-guided system significantly outperformed the end-to-end system with a LI-RADS grading accuracy of 68.3% (95% CI: 60.8%, 76.5%) vs 55.6% (95% CI: 48.8%, 63.0%) (

conclusionWe developed a semi-automatic step-by-step expert-guided LI-RADS grading system (LR-3 to 5), superior to the conventional end-to-end learning system. This deep learning-based system may improve workflow efficiency for HCC diagnosis in clinical practice.

Indexed as

deep learningHCChepatocellular carcinomaLI-RADSliver imaging reporting and data systemmagnetic resonance imagingMRI

Identifiers

PMID34235105
PMCPMC8255313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.