Automated production of [

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Strategies of positron emission tomography (PET) tracer development for imaging of tau and α-synuclein in neurodegenerative disorders.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025
   Review
2. Automated radiosynthesis of [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
   Article
3. Advances in Deep Neuropathological Phenotyping of Alzheimer Disease: Past, Present, and Future.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2022
   Article
4. High-performance renal imaging with a radiolabeled, non-excretable chimeric fusion protein.Theranostics · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as