Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234964›Full record

ArticleJournal of obesity

Concomitant versus Delayed Cholecystectomy in Bariatric Surgery.

Hatem Elgohary, Mahmoud El Azawy, Mohey Elbanna, Hossam Elhossainy, Wael Omar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obesity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hatem ElgoharyGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt.
Mahmoud El AzawyGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5827-3701
Mohey ElbannaDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hossam ElhossainyGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt.
Wael OmarGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt.
Helwan University · EGAin Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity and weight loss after bariatric surgery have a close association with gallbladder disease. The performance and proper timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with bariatric surgery remain a clinical question.

objectiveEvaluation of the outcome of LC during bariatric surgery whether done concomitantly or delayed according to the level of intraoperative difficulty.

methodsThe prospective study included patients with morbid obesity between December 2018 and December 2019 with preoperatively detected gallbladder stones. According to the level of difficulty, patients were allocated into 2 groups: group 1 included patients who underwent concomitant LC during bariatric surgery, and group 2 included patients who underwent delayed LC after 2 months. In group 1, patients were further divided into subgroups: LC either at the beginning (subgroup A) or after bariatric surgery (subgroup B).

resultsOperative time in group 1 vs. 2 was 92.63 ± 28.25 vs. 68.33 ± 17.49 (

conclusionTiming for LC during bariatric surgery is challenging and should be optimized for each patient as scheduling difficult LC to be performed after 2 months may be an option.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGallstonesObesity, MorbidCholecystectomyHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34234964
PMCPMC8216831
OpenAlexW3170090943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.