Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234809›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Tissue Resources for the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes.

Michèle Tixier-Boichard, Stéphane Fabre, Sophie Dhorne-Pollet, Adeline Goubil, Hervé Acloque, Silvia Vincent-Naulleau, Pablo Ross, Ying Wang, Ganrea Chanthavixay, Hans Cheng and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Livestock species as emerging models for genomic imprinting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Michèle Tixier-BoichardUniversity Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Stéphane FabreGenPhySe, INRAE, ENVT, ENSAT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Sophie Dhorne-PolletUniversity Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Adeline GoubilUniversity Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Hervé AcloqueUniversity Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Silvia Vincent-NaulleauUniversity Paris-Saclay, CEA, IRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Pablo RossUC Davis Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Ying WangUC Davis Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Ganrea ChanthavixayUC Davis Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Hans ChengUSDA-ARS Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Catherine ErnstDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Vicki LeesburgUSDA-ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT, United States.
Elisabetta GiuffraUniversity Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Huaijun ZhouUC Davis Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Collaborative Working Group
AgroParisTech · FRUniversity of California, Davis · USAgricultural Research Service · USCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInstitut National Polytechnique de Toulouse · FRMichigan State University · USPhysiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to generate an atlas of the functional elements driving genome expression in domestic animals, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genome (FAANG) strategy was to sample many tissues from a few animals of different species, sexes, ages, and production stages. This article presents the collection of tissue samples for four species produced by two pilot projects, at INRAE (National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment) and the University of California, Davis. There were three mammals (cattle, goat, and pig) and one bird (chicken). It describes the metadata characterizing these reference sets (1) for animals with origin and selection history, physiological status, and environmental conditions; (2) for samples with collection site and tissue/cell processing; (3) for quality control; and (4) for storage and further distribution. Three sets are identified: set 1 comprises tissues for which collection can be standardized and for which representative aliquots can be easily distributed (liver, spleen, lung, heart, fat depot, skin, muscle, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells); set 2 comprises tissues requiring special protocols because of their cellular heterogeneity (brain, digestive tract, secretory organs, gonads and gametes, reproductive tract, immune tissues, cartilage); set 3 comprises specific cell preparations (immune cells, tracheal epithelial cells). Dedicated sampling protocols were established and uploaded in https://data.faang.org/protocol/samples. Specificities between mammals and chicken are described when relevant. A total of 73 different tissues or tissue sections were collected, and 21 are common to the four species. Having a common set of tissues will facilitate the transfer of knowledge within and between species and will contribute to decrease animal experimentation. Combining data on the same samples will facilitate data integration. Quality control was performed on some tissues with RNA extraction and RNA quality control. More than 5,000 samples have been stored with unique identifiers, and more than 4,000 were uploaded onto the Biosamples database, provided that standard ontologies were available to describe the sample. Many tissues have already been used to implement FAANG assays, with published results. All samples are available without restriction for further assays. The requesting procedure is described. Members of FAANG are encouraged to apply a range of molecular assays to characterize the functional status of collected samples and share their results, in line with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles.

Indexed as

birdcryopreservationgenomemammalsrepositorytissue sampling

Identifiers

PMID34234809
PMCPMC8256271
OpenAlexW3180245850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.