Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234791›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Rice Seedling Growth Promotion by Biochar Varies With Genotypes and Application Dosages.

Minglong Liu, Zhi Lin, Xianlin Ke, Xiaorong Fan, Stephen Joseph, Sarasadat Taherymoosavi, Xiaoyu Liu, Rongjun Bian, Zakaria M Solaiman, Lianqing Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biochar Amendments Improve Licorice (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Minglong LiuInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Zhi LinInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Xianlin KeInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaorong FanInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Stephen JosephInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Sarasadat TaherymoosaviSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Xiaoyu LiuInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Rongjun BianInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Zakaria M SolaimanSchool of Agriculture and Environment, UWA Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Lianqing LiInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Genxing PanInstitute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Western Australia · AUMaterials Science & Engineering · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While biochar use in agriculture is widely advocated, how the effect of biochar on plant growth varies with biochar forms and crop genotypes is poorly addressed. The role of dissolvable organic matter (DOM) in plant growth has been increasingly addressed for crop production with biochar. In this study, a hydroponic culture of rice seedling growth of two cultivars was treated with bulk mass (DOM-containing), water extract (DOM only), and extracted residue (DOM-free) of maize residue biochar, at a volumetric dosage of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1%, respectively. On seedling root growth of the two cultivars, bulk biochar exerted a generally negative effect, while the biochar extract had a consistently positive effect across the application dosages. Differently, the extracted biochar showed a contrasting effect between genotypes. In another hydroponic culture with Wuyunjing 7 treated with biochar extract at sequential dosages, seedling growth was promoted by 95% at 0.01% dosage but by 26% at 0.1% dosage, explained with the great promotion of secondary roots rather than of primary roots. Such effects were likely explained by low molecular weight organic acids and nanoparticles contained in the biochar DOM. This study highlights the importance of biochar DOM and crop genotype when evaluating the effect of biochar on plants. The use of low dosage of biochar DOM could help farmers to adopt biochar technology as a solution for agricultural sustainability.

Indexed as

biochardose-dependencelow molecular weight organic acidsnanoparticlesrice cultivarsroot morphologyseedling growth

Identifiers

PMID34234791
PMCPMC8256797
OpenAlexW3177303181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.