Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234742›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021

Pre-Menopausal Women With Breast Cancers Having High AR/ER Ratios in the Context of Higher Circulating Testosterone Tend to Have Poorer Outcomes.

Savitha Rajarajan, Aruna Korlimarla, Annie Alexander, C E Anupama, Rakesh Ramesh, B S Srinath, T S Sridhar, Jyothi S Prabhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Elucidating Sex-Specific Immune Profiles in a Breast Cancer Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modulating the Activity of Androgen Receptor for Treating Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Savitha RajarajanDivision of Molecular Medicine, St. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Aruna KorlimarlaDivision of Molecular Medicine, St. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Annie AlexanderDivision of Molecular Medicine, St. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
C E AnupamaDivision of Molecular Medicine, St. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Rakesh RameshDepartment of Surgical Oncology, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, India.
B S SrinathDepartment of Surgery, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, India.
T S SridharDivision of Molecular Medicine, St. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Jyothi S PrabhuDivision of Molecular Medicine, St. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences · INCancer Hospital and Research Institute · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · INSt.John's Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/18/1/503938Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Women with breast tumors with higher expression of AR are in general known to have better survival outcomes while a high AR/ER ratio is associated with poor outcomes in hormone receptor positive breast cancers mostly in post menopausal women. We have evaluated the AR/ER ratio in the context of circulating androgens specifically in patients younger than 50 years most of whom are pre-menopausal and hence have a high estrogenic hormonal milieu. Methods: Tumor samples from patients 50 years or younger at first diagnosis were chosen from a larger cohort of 270 patients with median follow-up of 72 months. Expression levels of ER and AR proteins were detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the transcript levels by quantitative PCR. Ciculating levels of total testosterone were estimated from serum samples. A ratio of AR/ER was derived using the transcript levels, and tumors were dichotomized into high and low ratio groups based on the third quartile value. Survival and the prognostic significance of the ratio was compared between the low and high ratio groups in all tumors and also within ER positive tumors. Results were further validated in external datasets (TCGA and METABRIC). Results: Eighty-eight (32%) patients were ≤50 years, with 22 having high AR/ER ratio calculated using the transcript levels. Circulating levels of total testosterone were higher in women whose tumors had a high AR/ER ratio (p = 0.02). Tumors with high AR/ER ratio had significantly poorer disease-free survival than those with low AR/ER ratio [HR-2.6 (95% CI-1.02-6.59) p = 0.04]. Evaluation of tumors with high AR/ER ratio within ER positive tumors alone reconfirmed the prognostic relevance of the high AR/ER ratio with a significant hazard ratio of 4.6 (95% CI-1.35-15.37, p = 0.01). Similar trends were observed in the TCGA and METABRIC dataset. Conclusion: Our data in pre-menopausal women with breast cancer suggest that it is not merely the presence or absence of AR expression but the relative activity of ER, as well as the hormonal milieu of the patient that determine clinical outcomes, indicating that both context and interactions ultimately influence tumor behavior.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTestosteroneReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenTestosteroneandrogen receptorAR/ER ratiobreast cancerpre-menopausaltestosterone

Identifiers

PMID34234742
PMCPMC8256854
OpenAlexW3176226502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.