ArticleInternational journal of health sciences
Parenteral versus enteral nutrition in children with post-surgical congenital heart disease.
Article in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors of malnutrition in children with congenital heart disease: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of a unit-wide feeding tolerance management protocol on enteral feeding outcomes in infants with congenital heart disease: a pre-post quality improvement cohort study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Nutritional support in children treated for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe association of malnutrition with congenital heart disease (CHD) is well documented. Studies comparing the effects of parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral feeding (EF) on the post-surgical correction of CHD are not available. We compared the effects of PN with EF on the nutritional status of children post-cardiac surgery.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted with 72 children aged ≤6 years who had at least one heart surgery between 2010 and 2016. Malnutrition was defined as a weight for height Z-score (WHZ) below -2. The primary endpoint was the change in the mean WHZ Z-score from the baseline. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0 [Release 21.0.0.0, IBM, USA].
resultsThe sample size realized as 72 (
conclusionMalnutrition occurs frequently with CHD. PN does not add any nutritional benefits compared with EF. EF should always be the preferred method of nutrition unless contraindicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34234634PMC8220642W3165915415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.