Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234556›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2021

Risk Factors of Delayed Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function After Ileostomy Reversal for Rectal Cancer Patients.

Lili Chu, Hui Wang, Suyu Qiu, Biyan Shao, Jia Huang, Qiyuan Qin, Yanjiong He, Jing Xue, Xiaoyan Li, Xiaoyan Huang and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07144969 (Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07144969 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo Hospital LahoreRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsIleostomy Closure, Gum Chewing, Honey, Postoperative RecoveryArmsHoney, gum chewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lili Chu *Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2155-5748
Hui Wang *Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Suyu Qiu *Department of General Surgery, Shunde New Rongqi Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, 510655, People's Republic of China.
Biyan ShaoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jia HuangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qiyuan QinDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yanjiong HeDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jing XueDepartment of Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyan LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyan HuangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Rongkang HuangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9499-0222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients.

methodsIn this retrospective study, the data of rectal cancer patients who underwent ileostomy reversal from January 2018 to December 2019 at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were assessed to investigate potential risk factors of delayed flatus after ileostomy reversal.

resultsA total of 282 patients were eligible for this study. Postoperative first flatus time ranged from 1 to 9 days, of which 58.8% patients presented with delayed flatus that was longer than 3 days. Univariate analysis showed that delayed postoperative flatus was significantly associated with the length of postoperative hospital stay (

conclusionIncreased intravenous fluid infusion at POD1 and duration of stoma ≥6 months were related to delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal functionileostomy reversalrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34234556
PMCPMC8254522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.