ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021
Association of Timing of Biliary Drainage with Clinical Outcomes in Severe Acute Cholangitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic versus Conventional Surgery for Acute Cholangitis of Severe Type: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Timing of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage for Acute Cholangitis Associated with Common Bile Duct Stones in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Timing of Biliary Drainage and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Cholangitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Delayed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a game-changer for acute cholangitis patients in a resource-limited setting.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Transmission of oral microbiota to the biliary tract during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of acute cholangitis of different severity.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Should lactate be added to Tokyo criteria for the evaluation of patients with acute cholangitis?Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Critically-Ill Patients with Biliary Obstruction and Cholangitis: Bedside Fluoroscopic-Free Endoscopic Drainage versus Percutaneous Drainage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe guidelines recommend urgent biliary drainage (BD) for severe acute cholangitis, without a clear definition of "urgent". To explore the optimal time, we identified the impact of timing of BD on clinical outcomes in severe acute cholangitis. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective study of patients with severe acute cholangitis was conducted based on the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Multivariable regressions were used to identified the effect of timing of BD on in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and the length of stay (LOS) in hospital and the intensive care unit (ICU) with adjustment for confounding factors.
resultsA total of 106 severe acute cholangitis patients underwent BD with a median time of 14.14 hours (IQR: 7.60-32.59). Among them, 67.9% were performed within 24 hours and 80.2% within 48 hours. Median length of stay was 2.65 days (IQR: 1.70-5.12) in the ICU and 7.54 days (IQR: 4.49-17.17) in hospital. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 13.2% and 14.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, every 1-day delay of BD increased 1.49 days of stay in hospital (P<0.0001). Delayed BD (>48 hours) was linked with 5.56 days longer ICU LOS (P = 0.0096), while urgent BD (<24 hours) did not significantly shorten the ICU stay (P = 0.0997). No significant increase was observed on in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.93-1.13) nor 30-day mortality (OR=1.01; 95% CI 0.87-1.14) with BD delay in this population.
conclusionIn severe acute cholangitis patients, delay in BD increased in-hospital LOS. BD after 48 hours was associated with longer ICU LOS. Yet, BD within 24 hours did not significantly reduce the mortality nor shortened the ICU LOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.