Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234498›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2021

External Validation of the Prognostic Prediction Model for 4-Year Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Hui Zhang, Dandan Chen, Jin Shao, Ping Zou, Nianqi Cui, Leiwen Tang, Xiyi Wang, Dan Wang, Zhihong Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Design and development of a Wechat applet for intelligent health management of metabolic syndrome.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hui ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Dandan ChenDepartment of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Jin ShaoDepartment of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Ping ZouSchool of Nursing, Nipissing University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3973-7830
Nianqi CuiDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Leiwen TangDepartment of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Xiyi WangSchool of Nursing, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Dan WangDepartment of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Zhihong YeDepartment of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA prediction model for 4-year risk of metabolic syndrome in adults was previously developed and internally validated. However, external validity or generalizability for this model was not assessed so it is not appropriate for clinical application. We aimed to externally validate this model based on a retrospective cohort. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective cohort design and a temporal validation strategy were used in this study based on a dataset from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2018. Multiple imputation was used for missing values. Model performance was evaluated by using discrimination, calibration (calibration plot, calibration slope, and calibration intercept), overall performance (Brier score), and decision curve analysis.

resultsIn external validation, the C-statistic was 0.782 (95% CI, 0.771-0.793). The calibration plot shows good calibration, calibration slope was 1.006 (95% CI, -0.011-1.063), and calibration intercept was -0.045 (95% CI, -0.113-0.022). Brier score was 0.164.The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model were good in temporal external validation.

conclusionThe discrimination and calibration of the prediction model were satisfactory in the temporal external validation. However, clinicians should be aware that this prediction model was developed and validated in a tertiary setting. It is strongly recommended that further studies validate this model in international cohorts and large, prospective cohorts in different institutions.

Indexed as

algorithmscalibrationdiscriminationmetabolic syndromeprediction modelprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34234498
PMCPMC8257261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.