Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234383›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

In-vivo impact of common cosmetic preservative systems in full formulation on the skin microbiome.

Barry Murphy, Michael Hoptroff, David Arnold, Richard Eccles, Stuart Campbell-Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Cosmetic Interventions for Skin Microbiome Modulation: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Skin Deep: The Potential of Microbiome Cosmetics.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barry MurphyUnilever Research & Development, Port Sunlight, Bebington, Wirral, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-5875
Michael HoptroffUnilever Research & Development, Port Sunlight, Bebington, Wirral, England, United Kingdom.
David ArnoldUnilever Research & Development, Port Sunlight, Bebington, Wirral, England, United Kingdom.
Richard EcclesInstitute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7210-6689
Stuart Campbell-LeeUnilever Research & Development, Port Sunlight, Bebington, Wirral, England, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservatives play an essentially role in ensuring that cosmetic formulations remain safe for use via control of microbial contamination. Commonly used preservatives include organic acids, alcohols and phenols and these play an essential role in controlling the growth of bacteria, fungi and moulds in substrates that can potentially act as a rich food source for microbial contaminants. Whilst the activity of these compounds is clear, both in vitro and in formulation, little information exists on the potential impact that common preservative systems, in full formulation, have on the skin's resident microbiome. Dysbiosis of the skin's microbiome has been associated with a number of cosmetic conditions but there currently are no in vivo studies investigating the potential for preservative ingredients, when included in personal care formulations under normal use conditions, to impact the cutaneous microbiome. Here we present an analysis of four in vivo studies that examine the impact of different preservation systems in full formulation, in different products formats, with varying durations of application. This work demonstrates that despite the antimicrobial efficacy of the preservatives in vitro, the skin microbiome is not impacted by preservative containing products in vivo.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Infective AgentsChemistry, PharmaceuticalCosmeticsFemaleHumansMicrobiotaMiddle AgedPreservatives, PharmaceuticalSkinYoung AdultAnti-Infective AgentsCosmeticsPreservatives, Pharmaceutical

Identifiers

PMID34234383
PMCPMC8263265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.