ArticleScientific reports2021
Relative platelet reductions provide better pathophysiologic signatures of coagulopathies in sepsis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Renal Impairment as an Independent Predictor of Sepsis in Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Platelet Recovery and Mortality in Septic Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association of early severe thrombocytopenia and platelet course with in-hospital mortality in critically ill children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In sepsis-associated coagulopathies and disseminated intravascular coagulation, relative platelet reductions may reflect coagulopathy severity. However, limited evidence supports their clinical significance and most sepsis-associated coagulopathy criteria focus on the absolute platelet counts. To estimate the impact of relative platelet reductions and absolute platelet counts on sepsis outcomes. A multicenter retrospective observational study was performed using the eICU Collaborative Research Database, comprising 335 intensive care units (ICUs) in the United States. Patients with sepsis and an ICU stay > 2 days were included. Estimated effects of relative platelet reductions and absolute platelet counts on mortality and coagulopathy-related complications were evaluated. Overall, 26,176 patients were included. Multivariate mixed-effect logistic regression analysis revealed marked in-hospital mortality risk with larger platelet reductions between days one and two, independent from the resultant absolute platelet counts. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for in-hospital mortality was 1.28[1.23-1.32], 1.86[1.75-1.97], 2.99[2.66-3.36], and 6.05[4.40-8.31] for 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%, and > 80% reductions, respectively, when compared with a < 20% decrease in platelets (P < 0.001 for each). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, platelet reductions ≥ 11% and platelet counts ≤ 100,000/μL on day 2 were associated with high coagulopathy-related complications (OR [95%CI], 2.03 and 1.18; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while only platelet reduction was associated with thromboembolic complications (OR [95%CI], 1.43 [1.03-1.98], P < 0.001). The magnitude of platelet reductions represent mortality risk and provides a better signature of coagulopathies in sepsis; therefore, it is a plausible criterion for sepsis-associated coagulopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.