Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234246›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Coating matching recommendation based on improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and collaborative filtering algorithm.

Yuan Xin, Bu Henan, Niu Jianmin, Yu Wenjuan, Zhou Honggen, Ji Xingyu, Ye Pengfei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuan XinSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, 212100, Jiangsu, China.
Bu HenanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, 212100, Jiangsu, China. hnbu520@just.edu.cn.
Niu JianminShanghai Shipbuilding Technology Research Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yu WenjuanShanghai Shipbuilding Technology Research Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zhou HonggenSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, 212100, Jiangsu, China.
Ji XingyuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, 212100, Jiangsu, China.
Ye PengfeiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, 212100, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China MC-202003-Z01-02National Natural Science Foundation of China 51804133Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20180977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coating matching design is one of the important parts of ship coating process design. The selection of coating matching is influenced by various factors such as marine corrosive environment, anti-corrosion period and working conditions. There are also differences in the coating performance requirements for different ship types and different coating parts. At present, the design of coating matching in shipyards depends on the experience of technologist, which is not conducive to the scientific management of ship painting process and the macro control of ship construction cost. Therefore, this paper proposes a hybrid algorithm of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and collaborative filtering based on user label improvement (IFCE-CF). Based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the evaluation index system of coating matching is constructed, and the weight calculation process of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is optimized by introducing the user label weight. The collaborative filtering algorithm based on matrix decomposition is used to realize the accurate recommendation of coating matching. Historical coating process data of a shipyard between 2010 and 2020 are selected to verify the recommendation ability of the method in the paper. The results show that using the coating matching intelligent recommendation algorithm proposed in this paper, the root mean square error is < 1.02 and the mean absolute error is < 0.75, the prediction accuracy is significantly better than other research methods, which proves the effectiveness of the method.

Identifiers

PMID34234246
PMCPMC8263793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.