Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234222›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Antimicrobial resistant bacteria recovered from retail ground meat products in the US include a Raoultella ornithinolytica co-harboring bla

Gregory A Ballash, Amy L Albers, Dixie F Mollenkopf, Emily Sechrist, Rachael J Adams, Thomas E Wittum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characterization of antimicrobial resistantCurrent research in food science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial-ResistantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gregory A BallashCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Amy L AlbersCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Dixie F MollenkopfCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Emily SechristCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rachael J AdamsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Thomas E WittumCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. wittum.1@osu.edu.

Funding

Short Trem Research Training for Veterinary StudentsT35OD010977 · OD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Christine A Petersen · 2012 to 2026
$1.1M
NIH HHS T35 OD010977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retail beef and pork, including processed products, can serve as vehicles for the zoonotic foodborne transmission of pathogens and antimicrobial resistant bacteria. However, processed and seasoned products like sausages, are not often included in research and surveillance programs. The objective of this study was to investigate retail ground beef and pork, including processed products, for the presence of common foodborne pathogens and antimicrobial resistant bacteria. We purchased 763 packages of fresh and fully cooked retail meat products during 29 visits to 17 grocery stores representing seven major grocery chains located in west and central Ohio. Each package of meat was evaluated for contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Salmonella spp., Enterobacteriaceae expressing extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance, and carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO). Only 3 of the 144 (2.1%) packages of fully cooked meat products contained any of these organisms, 1 with an extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL) Enterobacteriaceae and 2 with CPO. Among the 619 fresh meat products, we found that 85 (13.7%) packages were contaminated with MRSA, 19 (3.1%) with Salmonella, 136 (22.0%) with Enterobacteriaceae expressing an AmpC (bla

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialFood MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriabeta-LactamasesEnterobacteriaceaeFood ContaminationGenotypeHumansMeat ProductsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPlasmidsPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-lactamase KPC-2beta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID34234222
PMCPMC8263791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.