Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234177›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Effects of steam sterilization on reduction of fungal colony forming units, cannabinoids and terpene levels in medical cannabis inflorescences.

Shachar Jerushalmi, Marcel Maymon, Aviv Dombrovsky, Rafi Regev, Ze'ev Schmilovitch, Dvora Namdar, Nurit Shalev, Hinanit Koltai, Stanley Freeman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Decontamination of Soil Contaminated at the Surface withEnvironmental engineering science · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shachar JerushalmiInstitute of Plant Protection, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Marcel MaymonInstitute of Plant Protection, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Aviv DombrovskyInstitute of Plant Protection, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Rafi RegevInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Ze'ev SchmilovitchInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Dvora NamdarInstitute of Plant Sciences, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Nurit ShalevInstitute of Plant Sciences, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Hinanit KoltaiInstitute of Plant Sciences, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Stanley FreemanInstitute of Plant Protection, Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon Lezion, Israel. freeman@volcani.agri.gov.il.
Agricultural Research Organization · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical cannabis (MC) production is a rapidly expanding industry. Over the past ten years, many additional phytocannabinoids have been discovered and used for different purposes. MC was reported beneficial for the treatment of a variety of clinical conditions such as analgesia, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, Tourette's syndrome, epilepsy, glaucoma, Parkinson disease and more. Yet, there is still a major lack of research and knowledge related to MC plant diseases, both at the pre- and postharvest stages. Many of the fungi that infect MC, such as Aspergillus and Penicillium spp., are capable of producing mycotoxins that are carcinogenic, or otherwise harmful when consumed, and especially by those patients who suffer from a weakened immune system, causing invasive contamination in humans. Therefore, there are strict limits regarding the permitted levels of fungal colony forming units (CFU) in commercial MC inflorescences. Furthermore, the strict regulation on pesticide appliance application in MC cultivation exacerbates the problem. In order to meet the permitted CFU limit levels, there is a need for pesticide-free postharvest treatments relying on natural non-chemical methods. Thus, a decontamination approach is required that will not damage or significantly alter the chemical composition of the plant product. In this research, a new method for sterilization of MC inflorescences for reduction of fungal contaminantstes was assessed, without affecting the composition of plant secondary metabolites. Inflorescences were exposed to short pulses of steam (10, 15 and 20 s exposure) and CFU levels and plant chemical compositions, pre- and post-treatment, were evaluated. Steam treatments were very effective in reducing fungal colonization to below detection limits. The effect of these treatments on terpene profiles was minor, resulting mainly in the detection of certain terpenes that were not present in the untreated control. Steaming decreased cannabinoid concentrations as the treatment prolonged, although insignificantly. These results indicate that the steam sterilization method at the tested exposure periods was very effective in reducing CFU levels while preserving the initial molecular biochemical composition of the treated inflorescences.

Indexed as

CannabinoidsFungiSteamStem CellsSterilizationTerpenesCannabisDisinfectionDrug ContaminationInflorescenceCannabinoidsSteamTerpenes

Identifiers

PMID34234177
PMCPMC8263730
OpenAlexW3178125481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.