ArticleScientific reports2021
Fine adaptive precision grip control without maximum pinch strength changes after upper limb neurodynamic mobilization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07762937 (Effect of Neurodynamic Tensioning Added to a Grip Strengthening Program on Hand Grip Strength), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Neurodynamic Tensioning Added to a Grip Strengthening Program on Hand Grip Strength: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The neurogenic elbow disharmony loop: a pathophysiologic model for chronic elbow pain supported by one hundred and fifty seven radial tunnel decompressions.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Before and immediately after passive upper limb neurodynamic mobilizations targeting the median nerve, grip ([Formula: see text]) and load ([Formula: see text]) forces applied by the thumb, index and major fingers (three-jaw chuck pinch) were collected using a manipulandum during three different grip precision tasks: grip-lift-hold-replace (GLHR), vertical oscillations (OSC), and vertical oscillations with up and down collisions (OSC/COLL/u, OSC/COLL/d). Several parameters were collected or computed from [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Maximum pinch strength and fingertips pressure sensation threshold were also examined. After the mobilizations, [Formula: see text] max changes from 3.2 ± 0.4 to 3.4 ± 0.4 N (p = 0.014), d[Formula: see text] from 89.0 ± 66.6 to 102.2 ± 59.6 [Formula: see text] (p = 0.009), and d[Formula: see text] from 43.6 ± 17.0 to 56.0 ± 17.9 [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]0.001) during GLHR. [Formula: see text] SD changes from 0.9 ± 0.3 to 1.0 ± 0.2 N (p = 0.004) during OSC. [Formula: see text] peak changes from 17.4 ± 8.3 to 15.1 ± 7.5 N ([Formula: see text]0.001), [Formula: see text] from 12.4 ± 6.7 to 11.3 ± 6.8 N (p = 0.033), and [Formula: see text] from 2.9 ± 0.4 to 3.00 ± 0.4 N (p = 0.018) during OSC/COLL/u. [Formula: see text] peak changes from 13.5 ± 7.4 to 12.3 ± 7.7 N (p = 0.030) and [Formula: see text] from 14.5 ± 6.0 to 13.6 ± 5.5 N (p = 0.018) during OSC/COLL/d. Sensation thresholds at index and thumb were reduced (p = 0.001, p = 0.008). Precision grip adaptations observed after the mobilizations could be partly explained by changes in cutaneous median-nerve pressure afferents from the thumb and index fingertips.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.