Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34234160›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Oropharyngeal cancer patient stratification using random forest based-learning over high-dimensional radiomic features.

Harsh Patel, David M Vock, G Elisabeta Marai, Clifton D Fuller, Abdallah S R Mohamed, Guadalupe Canahuate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Harsh PatelDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242, USA.
David M VockDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
G Elisabeta MaraiDepartment of Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, 60607, USA.
Clifton D FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030, USA.
Abdallah S R MohamedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030, USA.
Guadalupe CanahuateDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242, USA. guadalupe-canahuate@uiowa.edu.

Funding

Longitudinal Spatial-Nonspatial Decision Support for Competing Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer TherapyR01CA258827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
SMART-ACT: Spatial Methodologic Approaches for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Adaptation in Cancer TreatmentR01CA214825 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214825NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258827NIH HHS R01CA214825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve risk prediction for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients using cluster analysis on the radiomic features extracted from pre-treatment Computed Tomography (CT) scans. 553 OPC Patients randomly split into training (80%) and validation (20%), were classified into 2 or 3 risk groups by applying hierarchical clustering over the co-occurrence matrix obtained from a random survival forest (RSF) trained over 301 radiomic features. The cluster label was included together with other clinical data to train an ensemble model using five predictive models (Cox, random forest, RSF, logistic regression, and logistic-elastic net). Ensemble performance was evaluated over the independent test set for both recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier curves for OS stratified by cluster label show significant differences for both training and testing (p val < 0.0001). When compared to the models trained using clinical data only, the inclusion of the cluster label improves AUC test performance from .62 to .79 and from .66 to .80 for OS and RFS, respectively. The extraction of a single feature, namely a cluster label, to represent the high-dimensional radiomic feature space reduces the dimensionality and sparsity of the data. Moreover, inclusion of the cluster label improves model performance compared to clinical data only and offers comparable performance to the models including raw radiomic features.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAgedAlgorithmsArea Under CurveCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPrognosisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID34234160
PMCPMC8263609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.