SynthesisBMJ open2021
Design features that reduce the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health facilities: a rapid systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Impact of the design of adult mental health inpatient facilities on healthcare staff: a mixed methods systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Association between ward structural changes and coercive interventions in psychiatric emergency wards in Japan: a retrospective study.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Article
- Incidence of Using Physical, Mechanical Restraints and Seclusion in Saudi Mental Health Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Functional, Contextual, and Interventional Drivers of Formal Coercion in Acute Mental Health Units: A Feature Analysis.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Carers' Perceptions of Seclusion and Restraints in Mental Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Review
- Differentiating Therapeutic Responses That Reduce Restrictive Practice Use and Situational Aggression in an Acute Mental Health Unit.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Article
- Violence and Restrictive Practices Reduced by Hospital Relocation.Brain and behavior · 2025Observational
- Implementation of a Sensory Room in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- Victorian Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Mental Health Reform: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Safe Steps for De-escalation: A protocol for a mixed concurrent control study in acute mental health units.PloS one · 2025Article
- No-Restraint Committed General Hospital Psychiatric Units (SPDCs) in Italy-A Descriptive Organizational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Do improved structural surroundings reduce restrictive practices in psychiatry?International journal of mental health systems · 2022Article
- Article
- Relational security: The impact of facility design on youth custodial staffs' practices and approaches.Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH · 2022Article
- Space and Well-Being in High Security Environments.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing efforts are being made to prevent and/or eliminate the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health facilities. Recent literature recognises the importance of the physical environment in supporting better outcomes in mental health services. This rapid review scoped the existing literature studying what physical design features of mental health facilities can reduce the use of seclusion and physical restraint.
designA rapid review of peer-reviewed literature.
methodsPeer-reviewed literature was searched for studies on architectural design and the use of restraint and seclusion in mental health facilities. The following academic databases were searched: Cochrane Library, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus and Avery for English language literature published between January 2010 and August 2019. The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of included studies.
resultsWe identified 35 peer-reviewed studies. The findings revealed several overarching themes in design efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint: a beneficial physical environment (eg, access to gardens or recreational facilities); sensory or comfort rooms; and private, uncrowded and calm spaces. The critical appraisal indicated that the overall quality of studies was low, as such the findings should be interpreted with caution.
conclusionThis study found preliminary evidence that the physical environment has a role in supporting the reduction in the use of seclusion and restraint. This is likely to be achieved through a multilayered approach, founded on good design features and building towards specific design features which may reduce occurrences of seclusion and restraint. Future designs should include consumers in a codesign process to maximise the potential for change and innovation that is genuinely guided by the insights of lived experience expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.