ArticleBMJ open2021
Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04041973 (An Open-label Individually Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Artemether-lumefantrine Prophylaxis for Malaria Among Forest Goers in Cambodia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-label Individually Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Artemether-lumefantrine Prophylaxis for Malaria Among Forest Goers in Cambodia
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community engagement among forest goers in a malaria prophylaxis trial: implementation challenges and implications.Malaria journal · 2023Trial
- Antimalarial chemoprophylaxis for forest goers in southeast Asia: an open-label, individually randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2023Trial
- Modelling the optimal dosing schedule for artemether-lumefantrine chemoprophylaxis against malaria.BMC research notes · 2022Trial
- Forest malaria and prospects for anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis among forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Thailand.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Forest malaria and prospects for anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis among forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Lao PDR.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of malaria prophylaxis for forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Cambodia.Malaria journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn the Greater Mekong Subregion, adults are at highest risk for malaria. The most relevant disease vectors bite during daytime and outdoors which makes forest work a high-risk activity for malaria. The absence of effective vector control strategies and limited periods of exposure during forest visits suggest that chemoprophylaxis could be an appropriate strategy to protect forest goers against malaria. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol describes an open-label randomised controlled trial of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) versus multivitamin as prophylaxis against malaria among forest goers aged 16-65 years in rural northeast Cambodia. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of the artemisinin combination therapy AL versus a multivitamin preparation as defined by the 28-day PCR parasite positivity rate and incidence of confirmed clinical malaria of any species. The sample size is 2200 patient-episodes of duration 1 month in each arm. The duration of follow-up and prophylaxis for each participant is 1, 2 or 3 consecutive 28-day periods, followed by a further 28 days of post-exposure prophylaxis, depending on whether they continue to visit the forest. Analysis will be done both by intention to treat and per protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants will provide written, informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee and the Cambodia National Ethics Committee for Health Research. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed open access publication together with open data. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04041973; Pre-result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.