Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233962›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

The Prognostic Role of MYC Structural Variants Identified by NGS and FISH in Multiple Myeloma.

Neeraj Sharma, James B Smadbeck, Nadine Abdallah, Cinthya Zepeda-Mendoza, Moritz Binder, Kathryn E Pearce, Yan W Asmann, Jess F Peterson, Rhett P Ketterling, Patricia T Greipp and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recent Advances in The Definition of the Molecular Alterations Occurring in Multiple Myeloma.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  16. Research Progress on Pyroptosis in Hematological Malignancies.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. High or low? Assessing disease risk in multiple myeloma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Myeloma Genome Project Panel is a Comprehensive Targeted Genomics Panel for Molecular Profiling of Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Neeraj Sharma *Division of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-8229-3083
James B Smadbeck *Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nadine AbdallahDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9195-1589
Cinthya Zepeda-MendozaCytogenetics and Genomic Microarray Laboratory, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Moritz BinderDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9014-9658
Kathryn E PearceDivision of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yan W AsmannDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Jess F PetersonDivision of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rhett P KetterlingDivision of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Patricia T GreippDivision of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
P Leif BergsagelDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-7388
S Vincent RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shaji K KumarDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Linda B BaughnDivision of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Peter Leif Bergsagel · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
Onset and biomarkers for progression of monoclonal gammopathiesR01CA168762 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KUMAR, SHAJI KUNNATHU, RAJKUMAR, S VINCENT · 2012 to 2024
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStructural variants (SV) of the MYC gene region are common in multiple myeloma and influence disease progression. However, the prognostic significance of different MYC SVs in multiple myeloma has not been clearly established. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe conducted a retrospective study of multiple myeloma comparing MYC SV subtypes identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and FISH to MYC expression and disease survival using 140 cases from Mayo Clinic and 658 cases from the MMRF CoMMpass study.

resultsMYC SVs were found in 41% of cases and were classified into nine subtypes. A correlation between the presence of a MYC SV and increased MYC expression was identified. Among the nine MYC subtypes, the non-immunoglobulin (non-Ig) insertion subtype was independently associated with improved outcomes, while the Ig insertion subtype, specifically involving the IgL gene partner, was independently associated with poorer outcomes compared with other MYC SV subtypes. Although the FISH methodology failed to detect approximately 70% of all MYC SVs, those detected by FISH were associated with elevated MYC gene expression and poor outcomes suggesting a different pathogenic role for FISH-detected MYC subtypes compared with other MYC subtypes.

conclusionsUnderstanding the impact of different MYC SVs on disease outcome is necessary for the reliable interpretation of MYC SVs in multiple myeloma. NGS approaches should be considered as a replacement technique for a more comprehensive evaluation of the multiple myeloma clone.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaGenes, mycHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoglobulinsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesImmunoglobulins

Identifiers

PMID34233962
PMCPMC8738776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.