Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233722›Full record

Trial reportOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Cybernic treatment with wearable cyborg Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) improves ambulatory function in patients with slowly progressive rare neuromuscular diseases: a multicentre, randomised, controlled crossover trial for efficacy and safety (NCY-3001).

Takashi Nakajima, Yoshiyuki Sankai, Shinjiro Takata, Yoko Kobayashi, Yoshihito Ando, Masanori Nakagawa, Toshio Saito, Kayoko Saito, Chiho Ishida, Akira Tamaoka and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi NakajimaDepartments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization Niigata National Hospital, 3-52 Akasaka, Kashiwazaki, Niigata, 945-8585, Japan. nakajima.takashi.ud@mail.hosp.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5105-6619
Yoshiyuki SankaiCenter for Cybernics Research, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Shinjiro TakataDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, National Hospital Organization Tokushima National Hospital, Yoshinogawa, Japan.
Yoko KobayashiDepartment of Physical Rehabilitation, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.
Yoshihito AndoDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Masanori NakagawaDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshio SaitoDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Osaka Toneyama Medical Center, Toyonaka, Japan.
Kayoko SaitoInstitute of Medical Genetics, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku, Japan.
Chiho IshidaDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Iou National Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Akira TamaokaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takako SaotomeDepartment of Physical Rehabilitation, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.
Tetsuo IkaiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku, Japan.
Hisako EndoDepartments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization Niigata National Hospital, 3-52 Akasaka, Kashiwazaki, Niigata, 945-8585, Japan.
Kazuhiro IshiiDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Mitsuya MoritaDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Takashi MaenoDepartment of Physical Rehabilitation, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.
Kiyonobu KomaiDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Iou National Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Tetsuhiko IkedaDepartments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization Niigata National Hospital, 3-52 Akasaka, Kashiwazaki, Niigata, 945-8585, Japan.
Yuka IshikawaDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Shinichiro MaeshimaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine II, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Tsu, Japan.
Masashi AokiDepartment of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Michiya ItoHealth Administration and Policy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tatsuya MimaHuman Brain Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshihiko MiuraDepartment of Rehabilitation, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Jun MatsudaGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yumiko KawaguchiALS/MND Support Center Sakura, Nakano, Japan.
Tomohiro HayashiCYBERDYNE Inc., Tsukuba, Japan.
Masahiro ShinguCYBERDYNE Inc., Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiroaki KawamotoCYBERDYNE Inc., Tsukuba, Japan.
National Hospital Organization · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPCyberdyne (Japan) · JPJichi Medical University · JPNational Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPFujita Health University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPKyoto University · JPNitobe Memorial Nakano General Hospital · JPShizuoka University · JPTokushima Hospital · JPToneyama National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRare neuromuscular diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy, spinal bulbar muscular atrophy, muscular dystrophy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, distal myopathy, sporadic inclusion body myositis, congenital myopathy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis lead to incurable amyotrophy and consequent loss of ambulation. Thus far, no therapeutic approaches have been successful in recovering the ambulatory ability. Thus, the aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cybernic treatment with a wearable cyborg Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL, Lower Limb Type) in improving the ambulatory function in those patients.

resultsWe conducted an open-label, randomised, controlled crossover trial to test HAL at nine hospitals between March 6, 2013 and August 8, 2014. Eligible patients were older than 18 years and had a diagnosis of neuromuscular disease as specified above. They were unable to walk for 10 m independently and had neither respiratory failure nor rapid deterioration in gait. The primary endpoint was the distance passed during a two-minute walk test (2MWT). The secondary endpoints were walking speed, cadence, and step length during the 10-m walk test (10MWT), muscle strength by manual muscle testing (MMT), and a series of functional measures. Adverse events and failures/problems/errors with HAL were also evaluated. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B, with each group of 15 receiving both treatments in a crossover design. The efficacy of a 40-min walking program performed nine times was compared between HAL plus a hoist and a hoist only. The final analysis included 13 and 11 patients in groups A and B, respectively. Cybernic treatment with HAL resulted in a 10.066% significantly improved distance in 2MWT (95% confidence interval, 0.667-19.464; p = 0.0369) compared with the hoist only treatment. Among the secondary endpoints, the total scores of MMT and cadence at 10MWT were the only ones that showed significant improvement. The only adverse effects were slight to mild myalgia, back pain, and contact skin troubles, which were easily remedied.

conclusionsHAL is a new treatment device for walking exercise, proven to be more effective than the conventional method in patients with incurable neuromuscular diseases.

trial registrationJMACTR, JMA-IIA00156.

Indexed as

Neuromuscular DiseasesWearable Electronic DevicesCross-Over StudiesExercise TherapyHumansLower ExtremityCybernicsGait exerciseHybrid Assistive Limb (HAL)Neuromuscular disease

Identifiers

PMID34233722
PMCPMC8261928
OpenAlexW3182639744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.