Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233710›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2021

Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis.

Samantha Hollingworth, Ama Pokuaa Fenny, Su-Yeon Yu, Francis Ruiz, Kalipso Chalkidou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health technology assessment capacity to support Zambia's health benefits package reform policy.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samantha HollingworthSchool of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall St, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia. s.hollingworth@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-5663
Ama Pokuaa FennyInstitute of Statistical, Social and Economics Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-1265
Su-Yeon YuNational Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5488-5068
Francis RuiziDSI, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-3959
Kalipso ChalkidouThe Global Fund To Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7087-2803

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1087363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCountries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are moving towards universal health coverage. The process of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) can support decisions relating to benefit package design and service coverage. HTA involves institutional cooperation with agreed methods and procedural standards. We systematically reviewed the literature on policies and capacity building to support HTA institutionalisation in SSA.

methodsWe systematically reviewed the literature by searching major databases (PubMed, Embase, etc.) until June 2019 using terms considering three aspects: HTA; health policy, decision making; and SSA. We quantitatively extracted and descriptively analysed content and conducted a narrative synthesis eliciting themes from the selected literature, which varied in study type and apporach.

resultsHalf of the 49 papers identified were primary research studies and mostly qualitative. Five countries were represented in six of ten studies; South Africa, Ghana, Uganda, Cameroon, and Ethiopia. Half of first authors were from SSA. Most informants were policy makers. Five themes emerged: (1) use of HTA; (2) decision-making in HTA; (3) values and criteria for setting priority areas in HTA; (4) involving stakeholders in HTA; and (5) specific examples of progress in HTA in SSA. The first one was the main theme where there was little use of evidence and research in making policy. The awareness of HTA and economic evaluation was low, with inadequate expertise and a lack of local data and tools.

conclusionsDespite growing interest in HTA in SSA countries, awareness remains low and HTA-related activities are uncoordinated and often disconnected from policy. Further training and skills development are needed, firmly linked to a strategy focusing on strengthening within-country partnerships, particularly among researchers and policy makers. The international community has an important role here by supporting policy- relevant technical assistance, highlighting that sustainable financing demands evidence-based processes for effective resource allocation, and catalysing knowledge-sharing opportunities among countries facing similar challenges.

Indexed as

Capacity buildingDecision makingHealth technology assessmentNarrative synthesisPolicy makingPriority settingSub Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID34233710
PMCPMC8261797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.