Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233502›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2022

Prostate MRI quality: a critical review of the last 5 years and the role of the PI-QUAL score.

Francesco Giganti, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Alex Kirkham, Shonit Punwani, Mark Emberton, Caroline M Moore, Clare Allen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Prostate MR Imaging: Technical Foundations, Clinical Applications, and Workflow Implications.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Innovations in prostate cancer: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesco GigantiDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-6431
Veeru KasivisvanathanDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Alex KirkhamDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Shonit PunwaniDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark EmbertonDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Caroline M MooreDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Clare AllenDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the prostate cancer pathway. The European Association of Urology (EAU) and the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) now advise mpMRI prior to biopsy, and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) recommendations set out the minimal technical requirements for the acquisition of mpMRI of the prostate.The widespread and swift adoption of this technique has led to variability in image quality. Suboptimal image acquisition reduces the sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI for the detection and staging of clinically significant prostate cancer.This critical review outlines the studies aimed at improving prostate MR quality that have been published over the last 5 years. These span from the use of specific MR sequences, magnets and coils to patient preparation. The rates of adherence of prostate mpMRI to technical standards in different cohorts across the world are also discussed.Finally, we discuss the first standardised scoring system (

Indexed as

BiopsyGuideline AdherenceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstatic NeoplasmsQuality ImprovementSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34233502
PMCPMC8978249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.