Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233491›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022

Tumour growth rates of prostate cancer during active surveillance: is there a difference between MRI-visible low and intermediate-risk disease?

Francesco Giganti, Clare Allen, Vasilis Stavrinides, Armando Stabile, Aiman Haider, Alex Freeman, Nora Pashayan, Shonit Punwani, Mark Emberton, Caroline M Moore and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Innovations in prostate cancer: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco GigantiDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-6431
Clare AllenDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Vasilis StavrinidesDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Armando StabileDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Aiman HaiderDepartment of Pathology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alex FreemanDepartment of Pathology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nora PashayanDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Shonit PunwaniDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark EmbertonDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Caroline M MooreDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Alex KirkhamDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S005897/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in lesion volume on serial multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) during active surveillance for prostate cancer.

methodsA total of 160 patients with a targeted biopsy-confirmed visible lesion on mpMRI, stratified by low- and intermediate-risk disease (Gleason Grade Group 1 vs Gleason Grade Group 2), were analysed. The % change per year was calculated using the formula:

resultsThere was no significant difference in the annual median percentage change between Gleason Grade Group 1 (18%) and Gleason Grade Group 2 (23%) disease (p = 0.16), and between ≤ 10% (23%) and > 10% (22%) of Gleason pattern 4 (p = 0.78).Assuming a spherical lesion, these changes corresponded to annual increases in mean tumour diameter of 6% and 7% for Gleason Grade Group 1 and Gleason Grade Group 2 respectively, which may be less than the interscan variability of serial mpMRI.

conclusionIn an active surveillance cohort, we did not see a significant difference in the annual growth rate of Gleason Grade Group 1 and 2 tumours. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In patients on active surveillance, the measured growth rates for visible tumours in Gleason Grade Groups 1 and 2 were similar. The annual growth rate was small in most cases and this may have implications for the MRI follow-up interval in active surveillance.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingWatchful WaitingAgedContrast MediaHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLondonMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstatic NeoplasmsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID34233491
PMCPMC8978245
OpenAlexW3180708167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.