Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233459›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of radiology2021

Application of low-dose CT combined with model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in oncologic patients during follow-up: dose reduction and image quality.

Davide Ippolito, Cesare Maino, Anna Pecorelli, Ilaria Salemi, Davide Gandola, Luca Riva, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Davide IppolitoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, MB, Italy.
Cesare MainoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, MB, Italy.
Anna PecorelliDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, MB, Italy.
Ilaria SalemiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, MB, Italy.
Davide GandolaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, MB, Italy.
Luca RivaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, MB, Italy.
Cammillo Talei FranzesiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, MB, Italy.
Sandro SironiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, H Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, BG, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare image quality and radiation dose of CT images reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and hybrid-iterative (HIR) algorithm in oncologic patients.

methods125 oncologic patients underwent both contrast-enhanced low- (100 kV), and standard (120 kV) dose CT, were enrolled. Image quality was assessed by using a 4-point Likert scale. CT attenuation values, expressed in Hounsfield unit (HU), were recorded within a regions of interest (ROI) of liver, spleen, paraspinal muscle, aortic lumen, and subcutaneous fat tissue. Image noise, expressed as standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Radiation dose were analyzed. Paired Student's

resultsThe overall median score assessed as image quality for CT images with the MBIR algorithm was significantly higher in comparison with HIR [4 (range 3-4)

conclusionsMBIR combined with low-kV setting allows an important dose reduction in whole-body CT imaging, reaching a better image quality both qualitatively and quantitatively. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MBIR with low-dose approach allows a reduction of dose exposure, maintaining high image quality, especially in patients which deserve a longlasting follow-up.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiation DosageAdultAftercareAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34233459
PMCPMC8764930
OpenAlexW3180932633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.