Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233446›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2022

Toxicity and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma above the age of 70 years compared to younger patients - a matched control multicenter cohort study.

Ron Ram, Sigal Grisariu, Liat Shargian-Alon, Odelia Amit, Yaeli Bar-On, Polina Stepensky, Moshe Yeshurun, Batia Avni, David Hagin, Chava Perry and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ron RamBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv. ronram73@gmail.com.
Sigal GrisariuDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation Hadassah University Hospital and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Medicine.
Liat Shargian-AlonSackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv, Israel; Institute of Hematology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.
Odelia AmitBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv.
Yaeli Bar-OnBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv.
Polina StepenskyDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation Hadassah University Hospital and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Medicine.
Moshe YeshurunSackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv, Israel; Institute of Hematology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.
Batia AvniDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation Hadassah University Hospital and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Medicine.
David HaginSackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv, Israel; Immunology Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv.
Chava PerryBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv.
Ronit GurionSackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv, Israel; Institute of Hematology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.
Nadav SaridBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv.
Yair HerishanuBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv.
Ronit GoldBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv.
Chen Glait-SantarBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv.
Sigi KayBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv.
Irit AviviBMT Unit, Aviv (Sourasky) Medical Center, Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Aviv University, Aviv.
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILRabin Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data regarding efficacy and toxicity of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the elderly, geriatric population are insufficient. In 2019, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene-ciloleucel were commercially approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. From May 2019 onwards, 47 relapsed/refractory diffuse large Bcell lymphoma patients, ≥70 years underwent lymphopharesis in three Israeli centers. Elderly (n=41, mean age 76.2 years) and young (n=41, mean age 55.4 years) patients were matched based on ECOG performance status and lactose dehydrogenase levels. There were no differences in CD4/CD8 ratio (P=0.94), %CD4 naive (P=0.92), %CD8 naive (P=0.44) and exhaustion markers (both HLA-DR and PD-1) between CAR-T cell products in both cohorts. Forty-one elderly patients (87%) received CAR-T cell infusion. There were no differences in the incidence of grade ≥3 cytokine-release-syndrome (P=0.29), grade≥3 neurotoxicity (P=0.54), and duration of hospitalization (P=0.55) between elderly and younger patients. There was no difference in median D7-CAR-T cell expansion (P=0.145). Response rates were similar between the two groups (complete response 46% and partial response 17% in the elderly group, P=0.337). Non-relapse mortality at 1 and 3 months was 0 in both groups. With a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 1.3-17.2 months), 6- and 12-months progression-free and overall survival in elderly patients were 39% and 32%, and 74% and 69%, respectively. EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires, obtained at 1 month, showed worsening of disability and cancer-related-symptoms in elderly versus younger patients. We conclude that outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy are comparable between elderly, geriatric and younger patients, indicating that age as per se should not preclude CAR-T cell administration. Longer rehabilitation therapy is essential to improve disabilities and long-term symptoms.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, FollicularLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAgedAntigens, CD19Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMiddle AgedReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAntigens, CD19Receptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID34233446
PMCPMC9052918
OpenAlexW3177545806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.