Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233234›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2021

The BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents and young adults with cancer: A monocentric experience.

Gabriel Revon-Riviere, Laetitia Ninove, Victoria Min, Angélique Rome, Carole Coze, Arnauld Verschuur, Xavier de Lamballerie, Nicolas André

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Immunological and clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations: a systematic review.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Cancer Patients with COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Pediatric cancer patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2-a clinical and laboratory follow-up.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients: a narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel Revon-RiviereDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hematology and Oncology, Children Hospital of La Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Laetitia NinoveUnité des Virus Émergents (UVE) Aix-Marseille Univ-IRD 190-Inserm 1207-IHU Méditerranée Infection), Marseille, France.
Victoria MinDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hematology and Oncology, Children Hospital of La Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Angélique RomeDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hematology and Oncology, Children Hospital of La Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Carole CozeDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hematology and Oncology, Children Hospital of La Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Arnauld VerschuurDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hematology and Oncology, Children Hospital of La Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Xavier de LamballerieUnité des Virus Émergents (UVE) Aix-Marseille Univ-IRD 190-Inserm 1207-IHU Méditerranée Infection), Marseille, France.
Nicolas AndréDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Hematology and Oncology, Children Hospital of La Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France; SMARTc Unit, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Inserm U1068, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille France. Electronic address: Nicolas.andre@ap-hm.fr.
Hôpital de la Timone · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCOVID-19 infection in paediatric patients with cancer is severe or critical in 20% of the patients. It can therefore directly affect paediatric patients with cancer and/or their care. We aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with solid tumour.

methodsThis study includes a retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered to patients, ≥16 years old, under treatment for a solid tumour or within 6 months after treatment from 15th February 2021 to 15th April 2021. Two administrations of the vaccine 3 weeks apart were given. Sera were tested for anti-SARS-Cov-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies directed against the S1 domain of the spike protein. In case of positive serology, neutralisation of SARS-Cov-2 was tested.

resultsTwenty-three patients with solid tumours were identified and proposed to get vaccinated. Nine patients refused, and 1 previously developed COVID-19 infection with positive serology. At the time of writing, 13 patients (10 M/2 F; median age: 17) started vaccination. All patients received 2 injections except 2 patients who stopped vaccination because of tumour progression. Ten patients were under treatment (alone or in combination: chemotherapy: 7 patients [pts], immunotherapy: 2 pts, targeted therapy: 3 pts, follow-up: 3 patients). Overall, vaccines were well tolerated. Five patients did not report any side-effects after the first injection and 4 after the second injection. The main local reactivity symptom was mild pain at the site of injection (6 and 2 pts). Fatigue (2 pts and 5 pts) was the most frequent systemic symptom. One patient refused serology testing. All patients but 1 had pre-vaccination negative serology; 7 of 10 patients tested had positive serology before second vaccine injection, and 9 of 10 patients had positive serology one month after the second injection. All patients with seroconversion had positive COVID-19 neutralisation test. No patient developed COVID infections.

conclusionsWe report the good safety profile and good efficacy of the BNT162B2 vaccine in AYA with solid tumours. Larger series and monitoring of the kinetics of anti-Sars-Cov-2 IgG antibodies for several months are mandatory to confirm these preliminary results and to determine long-term vaccination.

Indexed as

ImmunizationAdolescentAge FactorsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFranceHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesAYACovid-19OncologyPaediatric oncologySerologyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34233234
PMCPMC8220943
OpenAlexW3174476213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.