Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34233003›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2021

Artificial Diets With Different Protein Levels for Rearing Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Caio Cesar Truzi, Natalia Fernanda Vieira, Joice Mendonça de Souza, Sergio Antonio De Bortoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Major Components ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biopesticide Compounds from an Endolichenic FungusMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caio Cesar TruziLaboratory of Biology and Insect Rearing, Department of Agricultural Production Sciences (Plant Protection), São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5768-3111
Natalia Fernanda VieiraLaboratory of Biology and Insect Rearing, Department of Agricultural Production Sciences (Plant Protection), São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3358-2583
Joice Mendonça de SouzaLaboratory of Biology and Insect Rearing, Department of Agricultural Production Sciences (Plant Protection), São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7174-8839
Sergio Antonio De BortoliLaboratory of Biology and Insect Rearing, Department of Agricultural Production Sciences (Plant Protection), São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0957-6164
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/00045-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a pest of great economic importance which can feed on more than 300 plant species. As it is polyphagous, its host plants may have variable physical and chemical constitutions. This may influence larval development, as protein and carbohydrate levels are important factors for adequate biological development. The aim of this study was to evaluate insect developmental parameters as well as to compare the food consumption of S. frugiperda larvae reared using diets with different protein levels under laboratory conditions. Three artificial diet formulations were used: one typically used for routine laboratory rearing, based on bean, wheat germ and brewer's yeast (D1); one containing half the original amount of protein (D2), and the other with twice the original amount of protein (D3). The relative consumption rate (RCR), relative growth rate (RGR), and efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) for S. frugiperda fourth instar larvae varied among diets. The protein present in the diet influenced the duration of larval and pupal periods and pupal weight, but did not affect larval survival, fecundity and longevity of adults. The different protein levels in the diets did not negatively influence population growth, so these three diet variations can be used for mass rearing in the laboratory. However, the influence of these diets on successive generations of the insect remains untested.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsLarvaMothsSpodopterafall armyworminsect biologymass rearingnutrition

Identifiers

PMID34233003
PMCPMC8262569
OpenAlexW3182372295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.