Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232993›Full record

ReviewBlood2021

Gene therapy for sickle cell disease: moving from the bench to the bedside.

Allistair A Abraham, John F Tisdale

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Optimizing the right time to start sickle cell therapies.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. In Vitro Correction of Point Mutations in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Genome editing strategies for targeted correction of β-globin mutation in sickle cell disease: From bench to bedside.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allistair A AbrahamCenter for Cancer and Immunology Research and.ORCID 0000-0003-2019-0887
John F TisdaleCellular and Molecular Therapeutics Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-8535-9439
Children's National · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

A preclinical large animal model for globin gene transferZ01HL006008 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI TISDALE, JOHN · 2008 to 2008
$330k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HL006008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy as a potential cure for sickle cell disease (SCD) has long been pursued, given that this hemoglobin (Hb) disorder results from a single point mutation. Advances in genomic sequencing have increased the understanding of Hb regulation, and discoveries of molecular tools for genome modification of hematopoietic stem cells have made gene therapy for SCD possible. Gene-addition strategies using gene transfer vectors have been optimized over the past few decades to increase expression of normal or antisickling globins as strategies to ameliorate SCD. Many hurdles had to be addressed before clinical translation, including collecting sufficient stem cells for gene modification, increasing expression of transferred genes to a therapeutic level, and conditioning patients in a safe manner that enabled adequate engraftment of gene-modified cells. The discovery of genome editors that make precise modifications has further advanced the safety and efficacy of gene therapy, and a rapid movement to clinical trial has undoubtedly been supported by lessons learned from optimizing gene-addition strategies. Current gene therapies being tested in clinical trial require significant infrastructure and expertise, given that cells must be harvested from and chemotherapy administered to patients who often have significant organ dysfunction and that gene-modification takes place ex vivo in specialized facilities. For these therapies to realize their full potential, they would have to be portable, safe, and efficient, to make an in vivo-based approach attractive. In addition, adequate resources for SCD screening and access to standardized care are critically important for gene therapy to be a viable treatment option for SCD.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAnimalsbeta-GlobinsClinical Trials as Topicgamma-GlobinsGene EditingGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHemoglobin, SickleHumansbeta-Globinsgamma-GlobinsHemoglobin, Sickle

Identifiers

PMID34232993
PMCPMC9069474
OpenAlexW3182677245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.