Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232771›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2021

Electrical epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord: implications for spinal respiratory neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury.

Ian G Malone, Rachel L Nosacka, Marissa A Nash, Kevin J Otto, Erica A Dale

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian G MaloneDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Rachel L NosackaDepartment of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Marissa A NashDepartment of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Kevin J OttoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Erica A DaleBreathing Research and Therapeutics Center (BREATHE), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-9909-8858
University of Florida · US

Funding

Functional mapping of peripheral and central circuits for airway protection and breathingOT2OD023854 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOLSER, DONALD C · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
Breathing Research and Therapeutics (BREATHE)T32HL134621 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Gordon S. Mitchell · 2017 to 2026
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134621NIH HHS OT2 OD023854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) can lead to damage of bulbospinal pathways to the respiratory motor nuclei and consequent life-threatening respiratory insufficiency due to respiratory muscle paralysis/paresis. Reports of electrical epidural stimulation (EES) of the lumbosacral spinal cord to enable locomotor function after SCI are encouraging, with some evidence of facilitating neural plasticity. Here, we detail the development and success of EES in recovering locomotor function, with consideration of stimulation parameters and safety measures to develop effective EES protocols. EES is just beginning to be applied in other motor, sensory, and autonomic systems; however, there has only been moderate success in preclinical studies aimed at improving breathing function after cSCI. Thus, we explore the rationale for applying EES to the cervical spinal cord, targeting the phrenic motor nucleus for the restoration of breathing. We also suggest cellular/molecular mechanisms by which EES may induce respiratory plasticity, including a brief examination of sex-related differences in these mechanisms. Finally, we suggest that more attention be paid to the effects of specific electrical parameters that have been used in the development of EES protocols and how that can impact the safety and efficacy for those receiving this therapy. Ultimately, we aim to inform readers about the potential benefits of EES in the phrenic motor system and encourage future studies in this area.

Indexed as

RespirationAnimalsCervical CordHumansNeuronal PlasticitySpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord Stimulationelectrochemical analysisepidural stimulationrespiratory neuroplasticityspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID34232771
PMCPMC8409953
OpenAlexW3182578395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.