Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232610›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2022

In-Cell Labeling and Mass Spectrometry for Systems-Level Structural Biology.

Juan D Chavez, Helisa H Wippel, Xiaoting Tang, Andrew Keller, James E Bruce

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Factors affecting protein recovery during Hsp40 affinity profiling.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Dissecting the structural heterogeneity of proteins by native mass spectrometry.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan D ChavezDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.
Helisa H WippelDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.
Xiaoting TangDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.
Andrew KellerDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.
James E BruceDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6441-6089
University of Washington · US

Funding

Quantitation of protein interactions in cancer cellsR01GM086688 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRUCE, JAMES EDWARD · 2009 to 2019
$4.2M
Dynamics of the cellular interactomeR35GM136255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI James Edward Bruce · 2020 to 2026
$4.0M
Instrumentation Development: MS Array for Quantitative ProteomicsR01GM097112 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRUCE, JAMES EDWARD · 2011 to 2020
$2.9M
The heart failure interactomeR01HL144778 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRUCE, JAMES EDWARD · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
An LC-FTICR Mass Spectrometer for Proteomics and Metabolomics ResearchS10RR025107 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRUCE, JAMES EDWARD · 2008 to 2008
$990k
New Technology for Protein Interaction Network and Topology AnalysisR01RR023334 · NCRR · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRUCE, JAMES EDWARD · 2007 to 2009
$750k
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR023334NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025107NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144778NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086688NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097112NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological systems have evolved to utilize proteins to accomplish nearly all functional roles needed to sustain life. A majority of biological functions occur within the crowded environment inside cells and subcellular compartments where proteins exist in a densely packed complex network of protein-protein interactions. The structural biology field has experienced a renaissance with recent advances in crystallography, NMR, and CryoEM that now produce stunning models of large and complex structures previously unimaginable. Nevertheless, measurements of such structural detail within cellular environments remain elusive. This review will highlight how advances in mass spectrometry, chemical labeling, and informatics capabilities are merging to provide structural insights on proteins, complexes, and networks that exist inside cells. Because of the molecular detection specificity provided by mass spectrometry and proteomics, these approaches provide systems-level information that not only benefits from conventional structural analysis, but also is highly complementary. Although far from comprehensive in their current form, these approaches are currently providing systems structural biology information that can uniquely reveal how conformations and interactions involving many proteins change inside cells with perturbations such as disease, drug treatment, or phenotypic differences. With continued advancements and more widespread adaptation, systems structural biology based on in-cell labeling and mass spectrometry will provide an even greater wealth of structural knowledge.

Indexed as

ProteinsProteomicsMass SpectrometryProteins

Identifiers

PMID34232610
PMCPMC8966414
OpenAlexW3180900381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.