Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232492›Full record

SynthesisCNS drugs2021

Exploring the Evidence for Broad-Spectrum Effectiveness of Perampanel: A Systematic Review of Clinical Data in Generalised Seizures.

Eugen Trinka, Simona Lattanzi, Kate Carpenter, Tommaso Corradetti, Bruna Nucera, Fabrizio Rinaldi, Rohit Shankar, Francesco Brigo

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Eugen Trinka *Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Associated Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Salzburg, Austria. e.trinka@salk.at.ORCID 0000-0002-5950-2692
Simona Lattanzi *Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Kate CarpenterKate Carpenter Medical Communications Ltd., Hitchin, UK.
Tommaso CorradettiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Bruna NuceraDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano-Meran, Italy.
Fabrizio RinaldiDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano-Meran, Italy.
Rohit ShankarCornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Medical School, Plymouth, UK.
Francesco BrigoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano-Meran, Italy.
Krankenhaus Meran · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITAnimal Free Research UK · GBParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of adjunctive perampanel has not been systematically assessed in seizure types other than its approved indications of focal seizures and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in idiopathic generalised epilepsies (IGEs).

objectiveWe aimed to identify and review available evidence on outcomes with perampanel in generalised seizures and epilepsies to examine its potential as a broad-spectrum anti-seizure medication.

methodsBibliographic databases of publications, clinical trials, and conference abstracts were searched up to August 2020 to identify studies reporting seizure or safety outcomes in patients of any age, with any type of epilepsy-associated generalised seizures treated with perampanel. Data extracted from selected records were tabulated by seizure type and syndrome, and analysed qualitatively (PROSPERO protocol CRD42020201564).

resultsNinety-one reports met inclusion criteria and were selected: 15 reports of 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 8 reports of 4 non-randomised interventional studies, 37 reports of observational studies, 21 case reports and 10 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Extracted data included 359 patients with PGTCS of any aetiology, 251 with myoclonic seizures, 112 with absence seizures, 50 with tonic seizures and 32 children with epileptic spasms. The most commonly reported epilepsy type was IGE (N = 378) and the most common syndromes were juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (N = 92), progressive myoclonic epilepsies (N = 59) and absence epilepsies (N = 43). The RCT provided Class I evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel for PGTCS in patients aged ≥ 12 years with IGE. Data from other studies provides weaker (observational) evidence of its effectiveness in multiple generalised seizure types, including myoclonic, absence and tonic seizures. There were no patterns suggesting seizure worsening or aggravation in any seizure or epilepsy type.

conclusionsThe identified studies suggest the potential of perampanel as a broad-spectrum antiseizure medication. Much of the available data, however, come from non-randomised, non-controlled studies and are open to high risk of bias. Further studies are warranted to provide more robust evidence.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsy, GeneralizedHumansMyoclonic Epilepsy, JuvenileNitrilesPyridonesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsNitrilesperampanelPyridones

Identifiers

PMID34232492
PMCPMC8354889
OpenAlexW3179183386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.