Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232484›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2021

Coronavirus-related health literacy and perceived restrictiveness of protective measures among community-dwelling older persons in Finland.

Johanna Eronen, Leena Paakkari, Erja Portegijs, Taina Rantanen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna EronenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland. johanna.eronen@jyu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5641-9156
Leena PaakkariFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Research Center for Health Promotion, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Erja PortegijsFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Taina RantanenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
University of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 255403European Research Council 693045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people with limited health literacy may encounter difficulties in finding relevant information on COVID-19, understanding its relevance, and complying with recommended protective measures. Complying with such recommendations has required older as well as younger persons to change their daily lives in ways that have reduced their opportunities for engaging in many activities meaningful to them.

aimsTo find out from what sources older people have obtained information on protective measures, the level of their coronavirus-related health literacy (CHL), and whether CHL is associated with their perceptions of the restrictiveness of coronavirus-related protective measures.

methods696 Finnish men and women aged over 77 answered a mailed questionnaire on their CHL, sources of information and perceptions of the restrictiveness of the recommended protective measures. The association of CHL with perceived restrictiveness was studied using multinomial logistic regression analysis.

resultsTelevision and newspapers were the most frequently reported sources of information. Reporting high confidence in the ability to assess how one's behavior influences coronavirus infection risk was associated with higher odds of perceiving the protective measures to be highly restrictive, when controlling for age, gender, and difficulty in using digital devices (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.09, 9.46). DISCUSSION: Participants who reported being highly confident about their ability to appraise the influence of their behavior on their susceptibility to coronavirus infection were more likely to perceive that the recommended protective measures had restricted their daily lives.

conclusionsHealth literacy plays a role in complying with recommended restrictions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansIndependent LivingMaleSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesAgingCOVID-19GerontologyHealth promotionParticipation

Identifiers

PMID34232484
PMCPMC8261814
OpenAlexW3181602031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.