Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232468›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2021

Hepatocyte-derived exosome may be as a biomarker of liver regeneration and prognostic valuation in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Yan Jiao, Wang Lu, Ping Xu, Honglin Shi, Dexi Chen, Yu Chen, Hongbo Shi, Yingmin Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan Jiao *Beijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Wang Lu *Fourth Department of Liver Disease, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Treatment Research, Beijing, 100069, China.
Ping XuBeijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Honglin ShiBeijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Dexi ChenBeijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Yu ChenFourth Department of Liver Disease, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Treatment Research, Beijing, 100069, China. chybeyond1071@ccmu.edu.cn.
Hongbo ShiBeijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China. shihongbo@ccmu.edu.cn.
Yingmin MaBeijing Institute of Hepatology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China. ma.yingmin@163.com.
Beijing YouAn Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing municipal medical research institute public welfare development and reform pilot project jingyiyan2019-6Chinese Foundation for Hepatitis Prevention and Control 2020033The Chinese Foundation for Hepatitis Prevention and Control TQGB20190050The National Natural Science Foundation of China 81672026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of liver regeneration is particularly critical for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Exosome has both the advantages of specificity of liver biopsy and noninvasion of peripheral blood, which may be the potential biomarker of liver disease.

methodsThe patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and ACLF were enrolled from outpatients and inpatients in Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University. The exosomes in plasma were extracted by ultracentrifuge using Optima XPN-100 Ultracentrifuge. Exosomes were dyed with fluorescent direct-labeled antibody and the expression profile was assayed using ImageStream® X MKII Imaging Flow Cytometer.

resultsThe percentage of exosomes with ALB and CD63 was significant higher in ACLF than that in CHB. The percentage of exosomes with ALB and CD63 and VEGF increased in CHB, but decreased in ACLF. The exosomes with ALB, CD63, and VEGF were significant more in survival group than that in dead group in patients with ACLF. The sensitivity and specificity of exosomes with CD63, ALB, and VEGF were significantly higher than the other markers of liver regeneration and prognostic valuation in patients with ACLF including AFP. The hepatocyte-derived exosomes expression profile had no difference in different stages and different AFP levels of patients with ACLF.

conclusionThe exosomes profile with ALB and VEGF may be a more accurate and specific biomarker of liver regeneration and prognostic valuation than AFP in patients with ACLF. In addition, the exosomes profile with CD63 and ALB may be an early-warning marker in patients with ACLF.

Indexed as

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureExosomesHepatitis B, ChronicBiomarkersHepatocytesHumansLiver RegenerationNerve Tissue ProteinsPrognosisBiomarkersNerve Tissue ProteinsNEXMIF protein, humanAcute-on-chronic liver failureAlbuminAmnis imaging flow cytometryBiomarkerCD63Chronic hepatitis BExosomeLiver regenerationPrognosisVascular epithelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID34232468
OpenAlexW3178202587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.