Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232431›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2022

Measuring Gambling Outcome Expectancies in Adolescents: Testing the Psychometric Properties of a Modified Version of the Gambling Expectancy Questionnaire.

Maria Anna Donati, Jeffrey L Derevensky, Beatrice Cipollini, Laura Di Leonardo, Giuseppe Iraci Sareri, Caterina Primi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Usefulness of a Revised Version of theChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Anna DonatiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug and Child's Health, Section of Psychology, University of Florence, via di San Salvi 12- Padiglione 26, 50135, Florence, Italy. mariaanna.donati@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7638-9137
Jeffrey L DerevenskyDepartment of Education and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Beatrice CipolliniDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug and Child's Health, Section of Psychology, University of Florence, via di San Salvi 12- Padiglione 26, 50135, Florence, Italy.
Laura Di LeonardoDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug and Child's Health, Section of Psychology, University of Florence, via di San Salvi 12- Padiglione 26, 50135, Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe Iraci SareriGruppo Incontro, Pistoia and CEART (Coordinamento Enti Ausiliari Regione Toscana), Pistoia, Italy.
Caterina PrimiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug and Child's Health, Section of Psychology, University of Florence, via di San Salvi 12- Padiglione 26, 50135, Florence, Italy.

Funding

Regione Toscana Resolution of the Tuscany Region n. 771, 9 July 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gambling Expectancy Questionnaire (GEQ; Gillespie et al. 2007a) is a 23-item scale assessing three positive outcome expectancies (Enjoyment/Arousal, Money, Self-Enhancement) and two negative outcome expectancies (Over-Involvement, Emotional Impact) related to gambling. It is the most used instrument to assess gambling outcome expectancies in adolescents and it has good psychometric properties. To allow a greater and more useful application of the scale, the present study aimed to modify the GEQ to make it usable with all adolescents, regardless of their gambling behaviour and to verify its psychometric properties. To that aim, the items were modified and the response scale was reduced from a seven-point to a five-point Likert scale. To verify the adequacy of the modified scale, two studies were conducted among Italian adolescents. In the first study (n = 501, 75% males, Mage = 16.74, SD = .88), after having removed four items and relocating another through explorative factor analysis, the original five-factor structure of the scale was confirmed by applying a confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability and validity evidence were also provided. The second study (n = 1894, 61% males, Mage = 15.68, SD = .71) attested its invariance across gambling behaviour status and gender. The modified version of the GEQ (GEQ - MOD) can be profitably used for research and preventive purposes with youth.

Indexed as

GamblingAdolescentFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsGamblingGambling Expectancy Questionnaire—ModifiedInvarianceOutcome expectancies

Identifiers

PMID34232431
PMCPMC8866277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.