Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232351›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2022

Value of pre- and postnatal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of congenital central nervous system anomalies.

Usha D Nagaraj, Charu Venkatesan, Karin S Bierbrauer, Beth M Kline-Fath

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Congenital brain malformations].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Usha D NagarajDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. usha.nagaraj@cchmc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8251-7481
Charu VenkatesanUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Karin S BierbrauerUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Beth M Kline-FathDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal MRI and neonatal MRI of the central nervous system (CNS) are complementary tools that can help to accurately counsel and direct the management of children with anomalies of the central nervous system. Postnatal MRI can add to fetal MRI by allowing for monitoring of changes in the severity of disease, better delineation of a suspected prenatal anomaly, evaluation for secondary pathologies related to the primary diagnosis, and surgical management direction. In this review we discuss the roles of fetal and neonatal MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital anomalies of the CNS through a series of case examples and how both are important in patient management.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingCentral Nervous System DiseasesChildFemaleFetusHumansInfant, NewbornNervous System MalformationsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisUltrasonography, PrenatalAnomalyBrainCentral nervous systemCongenitalFetusMagnetic resonance imagingNeonateSpinal dysraphismSpine

Identifiers

PMID34232351
OpenAlexW3178178329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.