Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232340›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021

[Surgical treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma].

Marcus Bahra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Surgical Treatment of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcus BahraZentrum für Onkologische Oberbauchchirurgie und Robotik, Krankenhaus Waldfriede, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Charité, Argentinische Allee 40, 14163, Berlin, Deutschland. m.bahra@waldfriede.de.
Krankenhaus Waldfriede · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for about 20% of bile duct cancers, representing the third most common tumor entity among periampullary cancers, along with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and carcinomas of the papilla of Vater. Precise diagnostics of tumor localization and exact knowledge of tumor-specific growth patterns are crucial for successful surgery. When planning the surgical procedure, the differential diagnosis of central bile duct cancer (Bismuth type I) or middle bile duct carcinoma must be considered. Although benign periampullary bile duct stenosis occurs in only 5% of cases, the presence of immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis (IAC) should be excluded in doubtful cases. Basically, in the presence of a distal cholangiocarcinoma, partial pancreatoduodenectomy is indicated analogous to the procedure for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. The 5‑year survival after resection is 20-25% and therefore comparable to adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Local resection of middle bile duct carcinoma is no longer recommended due to inadequate surgical radicality. To date, perioperative treatment for downsizing does not play a relevant role for surgical treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma. In the presence of a distal cholangiocarcinoma primary surgery with the aim of a R0 resection is the standard treatment of choice.

Indexed as

Ampulla of VaterBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansDifferential diagnosisGrowth patternsLocalization diagnosticsPeriampullary cancersPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34232340
OpenAlexW3180551277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.