ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021
[Surgical treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Essential Updates 2023/2024: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Biliary Tract Cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Surgical Treatment of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Comparison of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Preoperative prognostic nutritional index predicts short-term complications after radical resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for about 20% of bile duct cancers, representing the third most common tumor entity among periampullary cancers, along with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and carcinomas of the papilla of Vater. Precise diagnostics of tumor localization and exact knowledge of tumor-specific growth patterns are crucial for successful surgery. When planning the surgical procedure, the differential diagnosis of central bile duct cancer (Bismuth type I) or middle bile duct carcinoma must be considered. Although benign periampullary bile duct stenosis occurs in only 5% of cases, the presence of immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis (IAC) should be excluded in doubtful cases. Basically, in the presence of a distal cholangiocarcinoma, partial pancreatoduodenectomy is indicated analogous to the procedure for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. The 5‑year survival after resection is 20-25% and therefore comparable to adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Local resection of middle bile duct carcinoma is no longer recommended due to inadequate surgical radicality. To date, perioperative treatment for downsizing does not play a relevant role for surgical treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma. In the presence of a distal cholangiocarcinoma primary surgery with the aim of a R0 resection is the standard treatment of choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.