ArticleJAMA network open2021
Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Identify and Estimate Survival in a Longitudinal Cohort of Patients With Lung Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Clinical Documentation with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Perspectives in health information management · 2024Pooled it
- Temporal Trends in Clinical Evidence of 5-Year Survival Within Electronic Health Records Among Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer Managed With Laparoscopy-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- DEEP LEARNING OF SEMI-COMPETING RISK DATA VIA A NEW NEURAL EXPECTATION-MAXIMIZATION ALGORITHM.The annals of applied statistics · 2026Article
- Challenges in Identifying Heart Failure Diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record.Journal of cardiac failure - intersections · 2026Article
- Validating ICD code case definitions for condition case ascertainment in multimorbidity measurement: a retrospective chart review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Estimate renal cell carcinoma recurrence rates using electronic health records.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Using large language models to enhance clinically-driven missing data recovery algorithms in electronic health records.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Review
- Early detection of non-small cell lung cancer: an electronic health record data-driven approach.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Cancer Diagnosis Categorization in Electronic Health Records Using Large Language Models and BioBERT: Model Performance Evaluation Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods: The Path Forward in Achieving Equity in Lung Cancer Screening and Evaluation.Cancer innovation · 2025Article
- Large language models in perioperative medicine-applications and future prospects: a narrative review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Review
- Large Language Models in Cancer Imaging: Applications and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Using machine learning and single nucleotide polymorphisms for improving rheumatoid arthritis risk Prediction in postmenopausal women.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Predicting early stage lung cancer recurrence and survival from combined tumor motion amplitude and radiomics on free-breathing 4D-CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- A series of natural language processing for predicting tumor response evaluation and survival curve from electronic health records.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Analysis of the level of polypharmacy in patients from an isolated rural area: effect of age, sex, and chronic diseases.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Ambient beta particle radioactivity and lung cancer survival: Results from the Boston Lung Cancer Study.Environmental research · 2025Article
- Efficient and Robust Semi-supervised Estimation of Average Treatment Effect with Partially Annotated Treatment and Response.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2025Article
- Development of an AI model for predicting hypoxia status and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer using multi-modal data.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Electronic health records (EHRs) provide a low-cost means of accessing detailed longitudinal clinical data for large populations. A lung cancer cohort assembled from EHR data would be a powerful platform for clinical outcome studies. Objective: To investigate whether a clinical cohort assembled from EHRs could be used in a lung cancer prognosis study. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, patients with lung cancer were identified among 76 643 patients with at least 1 lung cancer diagnostic code deposited in an EHR in Mass General Brigham health care system from July 1988 to October 2018. Patients were identified via a semisupervised machine learning algorithm, for which clinical information was extracted from structured and unstructured data via natural language processing tools. Data completeness and accuracy were assessed by comparing with the Boston Lung Cancer Study and against criterion standard EHR review results. A prognostic model for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) overall survival was further developed for clinical application. Data were analyzed from March 2019 through July 2020. Exposures: Clinical data deposited in EHRs for cohort construction and variables of interest for the prognostic model were collected. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the performance of the lung cancer classification model and the quality of the extracted variables; the secondary outcome was the performance of the prognostic model. Results: Among 76 643 patients with at least 1 lung cancer diagnostic code, 42 069 patients were identified as having lung cancer, with a positive predictive value of 94.4%. The study cohort consisted of 35 375 patients (16 613 men [47.0%] and 18 756 women [53.0%]; 30 140 White individuals [85.2%], 1040 Black individuals [2.9%], and 857 Asian individuals [2.4%]) after excluding patients with lung cancer history and less than 14 days of follow-up after initial diagnosis. The median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis was 66.7 (58.4-74.1) years. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the prognostic model for overall survival with NSCLC were 0.828 (95% CI, 0.815-0.842) for 1-year prediction, 0.825 (95% CI, 0.812-0.836) for 2-year prediction, 0.814 (95% CI, 0.800-0.826) for 3-year prediction, 0.814 (95% CI, 0.799-0.828) for 4-year prediction, and 0.812 (95% CI, 0.798-0.825) for 5-year prediction. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest the feasibility of assembling a large-scale EHR-based lung cancer cohort with detailed longitudinal clinical measurements and that EHR data may be applied in cancer progression with a set of generalizable approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.