Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232193›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2021

Financial burden of postoperative complications following colonic resection: A systematic review.

Maleck Louis, Samuel A Johnston, Leonid Churilov, Ronald Ma, Christopher Christophi, Laurence Weinberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Over-the-scope clip for postsurgical anastomotic dehiscence and bleeding.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maleck LouisDepartment of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Samuel A JohnstonDepartment of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Leonid ChurilovDepartment of Medicine (Austin Health) & Melbourne Brain Centre at Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Victoria, Australia.
Ronald MaDepartment of Finance, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher ChristophiDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Laurence WeinbergDepartment of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7403-7680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonic resection is a common surgical procedure that is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. Postoperative complications are expected to be major contributors to hospital costs. Therefore, this systematic review aims to outline the health costs of postoperative complications following colon resection surgery.

methodsMEDLINE, Excerpta Medica database, Cochrane, and Economics literature medical databases were searched from 2010 to 2019 to identify English studies containing an economic evaluation of postoperative complications following colonic resection in adult patients. All surgical techniques and indications for colon resection were included. Eligible study designs included randomized trials, comparative observational studies, and conference abstracts.

resultsThirty-four articles met the eligibility criteria. We found a high overall complication incidence with associated increased costs ranging from $2290 to $43,146. Surgical site infections and anastomotic leak were shown to be associated with greater resource utilization relative to other postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were associated with greater incidence of hospital readmission, which in turn is highlighted as a significant financial burden. Weak evidence demonstrates increased complication incidence and costlier complications with open colon surgery as compared to laparoscopic surgery. Notably, we identified a vast degree of heterogeneity in study design, complication reporting and costing methodology preventing quantitative analysis of cost results.

conclusionsPostoperative complications in colonic resection appear to be associated with a significant financial burden. Therefore, large, prospective, cost-benefit clinical trials investigating preventative strategies, with detailed and consistent methodology and reporting standards, are required to improve patient outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of our health care systems.

Indexed as

Hospital CostsColectomyColonColonic DiseasesHumansPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID34232193
PMCPMC8270623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.