Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34232033›Full record

ArticleChemical reviews2021

Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems.

John A Keith, Valentin Vassilev-Galindo, Bingqing Cheng, Stefan Chmiela, Michael Gastegger, Klaus-Robert Müller, Alexandre Tkatchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 197 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
197citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

197 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AI-driven drug design: a comprehensive review.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Probabilistic Forecasting for Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John A KeithDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6583-6322
Valentin Vassilev-GalindoDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0001-7532-3590
Bingqing ChengAccelerate Programme for Scientific Discovery, Department of Computer Science and Technology, 15 J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3584-9632
Stefan ChmielaDepartment of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Michael GasteggerDepartment of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Klaus-Robert MüllerMachine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-7685
Alexandre TkatchenkoDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-1012-4854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning models are poised to make a transformative impact on chemical sciences by dramatically accelerating computational algorithms and amplifying insights available from computational chemistry methods. However, achieving this requires a confluence and coaction of expertise in computer science and physical sciences. This Review is written for new and experienced researchers working at the intersection of both fields. We first provide concise tutorials of computational chemistry and machine learning methods, showing how insights involving both can be achieved. We follow with a critical review of noteworthy applications that demonstrate how computational chemistry and machine learning can be used together to provide insightful (and useful) predictions in molecular and materials modeling, retrosyntheses, catalysis, and drug design.

Identifiers

PMID34232033
PMCPMC8391798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.