Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34231930›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2022

Influence of payer coverage and out-of-pocket costs on ordering of NGS panel tests for hereditary cancer in diverse settings.

Grace A Lin, Julia R Trosman, Michael P Douglas, Christine B Weldon, Maren T Scheuner, Allison Kurian, Kathryn A Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Covering medical care costs for participants in the eMERGE Network: Challenges for equity and implementation.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  8. Financial assistance programs for genetic testing: Effective, ethical, and sustainable pathways to improving access disparities?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Insurance denials and diagnostic rates in a pediatric genomic research cohort.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Grace A LinDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-641X
Julia R TrosmanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael P DouglasDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christine B WeldonCenter for Business Models in Healthcare, Glencoe, IL, USA.
Maren T ScheunerPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Allison KurianDepartments of Medicine and of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kathryn A PhillipsPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Sharing Aggregate Genomics Research Findings with Diverse Participants: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Design StrategyU01HG009599 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KOENIG, BARBARA A., KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2017 to 2021
$16.3M
Coverage, Price, and Reimbursement for Multigene Tests for Cancer and Related ConditionsR01CA221870 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PHILLIPS, KATHRYN A · 2018 to 2020
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA221870NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The landscape of payment for genetic testing has been changing, with an increase in the number of laboratories offering testing, larger panel offerings, and lower prices. To determine the influence of payer coverage and out-of-pocket costs on the ordering of NGS panel tests for hereditary cancer in diverse settings, we conducted semi-structured interviews with providers who conduct genetic counseling and order next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels purposefully recruited from 11 safety-net clinics and academic medical centers (AMCs) in California and North Carolina, states with diverse populations and divergent Medicaid expansion policies. Thematic analysis was done to identify themes related to the impact of reimbursement and out-of-pocket expenses on test ordering. Specific focus was put on differences between settings. Respondents from both safety-net clinics and AMCs reported that they are increasingly ordering panels instead of single-gene tests, and tests were ordered primarily from a few commercial laboratories. Surprisingly, safety-net clinics reported few barriers to testing related to cost, largely due to laboratory assistance with prior authorization requests and patient payment assistance programs that result in little to no patient out-of-pocket expenses. AMCs reported greater challenges navigating insurance issues, particularly prior authorization. Both groups cited non-coverage of genetic counseling as a major barrier to testing. Difficulty of access to cascade testing, particularly for family members that do not live in the United States, was also of concern. Long-term sustainability of laboratory payment assistance programs was a major concern; safety-net clinics were particularly concerned about access to testing without such programs. There were few differences between states. In conclusion, the use of laboratories with payment assistance programs reduces barriers to NGS panel testing among diverse populations. Such programs represent a major change to the financing and affordability of genetic testing. However, access to genetic counseling is a barrier and must be addressed to ensure equity in testing.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresNeoplasmsGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansUnited Statescostdecision-makinggenetic testinghereditary cancer panelsreimbursementunderrepresented populations

Identifiers

PMID34231930
PMCPMC8893352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.