ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2022
Influence of payer coverage and out-of-pocket costs on ordering of NGS panel tests for hereditary cancer in diverse settings.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical guidelines for deploying artificial intelligence applications in the pathology field: Lessons learned from a prospective framework in a large tertiary care academic medical center.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Precision Medicine in Rural Settings: Clinician Perspectives on Clinician-Ordered Genetic Testing.Research square · 2026Article
- When Covering and Discovering Are at Odds: How the Logic of US Health Insurance Undercuts the Promise and Equity of Precision Medicine for People with Hereditary Cancer Risks.Journal of health politics, policy and law · 2026Article
- Advanced Bayesian BMD-Derived Genome-Wide Polygenic Scores Enhance Clinical FRAX-Based Fracture Risk Prediction in Postmenopausal Women.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Yield of actionable variants from high-risk cancer gene panel testing in guideline-eligible and ineligible individuals.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Observational
- Covering medical care costs for participants in the eMERGE Network: Challenges for equity and implementation.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
- Financial assistance programs for genetic testing: Effective, ethical, and sustainable pathways to improving access disparities?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetic Test Utilization and Cost among Families of Children Evaluated for Genetic Conditions: An Analysis of USA Commercial Claims Data.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- Claim Denials for Cancer-Related Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicare.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Implementation of Cancer Genomics in the United States: Views of Payers and Other Stakeholders on Challenges and the Role of Payers in Solutions.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Potential barriers to implementation of next-generation sequencing in cancer management: a U.S. Physician-based survey.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Associations between subjective social status and predictors of interest in genetic testing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- The Role of Demographic and Clinical Factors in Germline Mutation Testing for Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Biomarker Testing, Targeted Therapy and Clinical Trial Participation by Race Among Patients With Lung Cancer: A Real-World Medicaid Database Study.JTO clinical and research reports · 2024Article
- Safety Aspects of Herb Interactions: Current Understanding and Future Prospects.Current drug metabolism · 2024Review
- Applying the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions to increase family communication about hereditary cancer.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Insurance denials and diagnostic rates in a pediatric genomic research cohort.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Measuring quality and value in genetic counseling: The current landscape and future directions.Journal of genetic counseling · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The landscape of payment for genetic testing has been changing, with an increase in the number of laboratories offering testing, larger panel offerings, and lower prices. To determine the influence of payer coverage and out-of-pocket costs on the ordering of NGS panel tests for hereditary cancer in diverse settings, we conducted semi-structured interviews with providers who conduct genetic counseling and order next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels purposefully recruited from 11 safety-net clinics and academic medical centers (AMCs) in California and North Carolina, states with diverse populations and divergent Medicaid expansion policies. Thematic analysis was done to identify themes related to the impact of reimbursement and out-of-pocket expenses on test ordering. Specific focus was put on differences between settings. Respondents from both safety-net clinics and AMCs reported that they are increasingly ordering panels instead of single-gene tests, and tests were ordered primarily from a few commercial laboratories. Surprisingly, safety-net clinics reported few barriers to testing related to cost, largely due to laboratory assistance with prior authorization requests and patient payment assistance programs that result in little to no patient out-of-pocket expenses. AMCs reported greater challenges navigating insurance issues, particularly prior authorization. Both groups cited non-coverage of genetic counseling as a major barrier to testing. Difficulty of access to cascade testing, particularly for family members that do not live in the United States, was also of concern. Long-term sustainability of laboratory payment assistance programs was a major concern; safety-net clinics were particularly concerned about access to testing without such programs. There were few differences between states. In conclusion, the use of laboratories with payment assistance programs reduces barriers to NGS panel testing among diverse populations. Such programs represent a major change to the financing and affordability of genetic testing. However, access to genetic counseling is a barrier and must be addressed to ensure equity in testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.